D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit R293:bcb5950e958e: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code (authored by bruns). CHANGED PRIOR TO COMMIT https://phabricator.kde.org/D28324?vs=78600=79582#toc REPOSITORY R293 Baloo CHANGES SINCE LAST

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

ngraham accepted this revision. ngraham added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. I think this is fine. REPOSITORY R293 Baloo BRANCH submit REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D28324 To: bruns, #baloo, ngraham Cc: pino, kde-frameworks-devel,

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

bruns marked 5 inline comments as done. REPOSITORY R293 Baloo REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D28324 To: bruns, #baloo, ngraham Cc: pino, kde-frameworks-devel, hurikhan77, lots0logs, LeGast00n, cblack, fbampaloukas, GB_2, domson, ashaposhnikov, michaelh, astippich, spoorun,

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

bruns marked an inline comment as done. bruns added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > pino wrote in kinotify.cpp:350 > no, an assert is sort of "program by contract": you make it clear that this > situation ought to not happen, and it if does, at least some people may > notice that > > >

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

pino added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > bruns wrote in kinotify.cpp:350 > asserts are IMHO pointless, nobody enables them, but it clutters the code. > Anyone touching the code should and has to read the man pages etc anyway. no, an assert is sort of "program by contract": you make it

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

bruns marked an inline comment as done. bruns added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > pino wrote in kinotify.cpp:350 > then add an assert for this case, referencing the documentation? asserts are IMHO pointless, nobody enables them, but it clutters the code. Anyone touching the code should

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

pino added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > bruns wrote in kinotify.cpp:350 > man inotify > > > IN_Q_OVERFLOW > > Event queue overflowed (wd is -1 for this event). then add an assert for this case, referencing the documentation? REPOSITORY R293 Baloo REVISION DETAIL

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

bruns marked an inline comment as done. REPOSITORY R293 Baloo REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D28324 To: bruns, #baloo, ngraham Cc: pino, kde-frameworks-devel, hurikhan77, lots0logs, LeGast00n, cblack, fbampaloukas, GB_2, domson, ashaposhnikov, michaelh, astippich, spoorun,

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

bruns marked an inline comment as done. bruns added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > pino wrote in kinotify.cpp:350 > ... but only also if wd is < 0 man inotify > IN_Q_OVERFLOW > Event queue overflowed (wd is -1 for this event). REPOSITORY R293 Baloo REVISION DETAIL

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

pino added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > bruns wrote in kinotify.cpp:350 > First check is here ... but only also if wd is < 0 REPOSITORY R293 Baloo REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D28324 To: bruns, #baloo, ngraham Cc: pino, kde-frameworks-devel, hurikhan77, lots0logs,

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

bruns added inline comments. INLINE COMMENTS > kinotify.cpp:350 > } > > // the event name only contains an interesting value if we get an > event for a file/folder inside First check is here REPOSITORY R293 Baloo REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D28324 To:

D28324: [Inotify] Remove dead/duplicate code

bruns created this revision. bruns added reviewers: Baloo, ngraham. Herald added projects: Frameworks, Baloo. Herald added a subscriber: kde-frameworks-devel. bruns requested review of this revision. REVISION SUMMARY event->mask & EventQueueOverflow is already checked once early in the