Re: Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

2017-02-04 Thread Elvis Angelaccio
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:28 PM, Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va >> escriure: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories >>> (not

Re: Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

2017-02-04 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 6:30 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: >> Hi everyone, >> >> We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories >> (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator.

Re: Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

2017-02-04 Thread Kai Uwe Broulik
> Does anyone have love for the current syntax? I have a khotkeys macro for that... +1 for DIFFERENTIAL. It also seems that release scripts don't extract Phabricator links for inclusion in the changelog (it does that with REVIEW) Cheers, Kai Uwe

Differential commit log keyword is uncomfortable - WAS - Re: Phabricator: All repositories registered - upcoming workflow changes

2017-02-04 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El diumenge, 29 de gener de 2017, a les 8:32:21 CET, Ben Cooksley va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > We've just completed the registration of all mainline repositories > (not including Websites or Sysadmin namespaced ones) on Phabricator. > Thanks go to Luigi Toscano for providing significant assista