Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-03 Thread David Faure
Hi Ben. Thanks for your fixes, much appreciated. On jeudi 2 mars 2017 09:08:25 CET Ben Cooksley wrote: > We'd need a strong use case to explain to upstream why repository > should be in the Subject, IMHO the use case *is* strong. If you watch many repositories (as we do on this list), then

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-02 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 10:41 AM, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On čtvrtek 2. března 2017 9:08:25 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> In regards to the way email subjects are treated, I've now customised >> the metamta.differential.subject-prefix preference on our installation >> to be blank, to

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-02 Thread Jan Kundrát
On čtvrtek 2. března 2017 9:08:25 CET, Ben Cooksley wrote: In regards to the way email subjects are treated, I've now customised the metamta.differential.subject-prefix preference on our installation to be blank, to the "[Differential]" part should no longer be present. Roughly at the time you

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-02 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Dominik Haumann wrote: > Hi, Hi all, > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Faure wrote: >> On mercredi 1 mars 2017 13:35:47 CET Kevin Funk wrote: >>> On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 21:31:44 CET Michael Pyne wrote: >>> > On

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-01 Thread Dominik Haumann
Hi, On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:16 PM, David Faure wrote: > On mercredi 1 mars 2017 13:35:47 CET Kevin Funk wrote: >> On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 21:31:44 CET Michael Pyne wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:38:12PM +0100, Ivan Čukić wrote: >> > > > [Differential] D4508: Plasma

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-01 Thread David Faure
On mercredi 1 mars 2017 13:35:47 CET Kevin Funk wrote: > On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 21:31:44 CET Michael Pyne wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:38:12PM +0100, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > > [Differential] D4508: Plasma controls based on QtQuickControls2 > > > > [Commented On]> > > > > > > >

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-01 Thread Kevin Funk
On Tuesday, 28 February 2017 21:31:44 CET Michael Pyne wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:38:12PM +0100, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > [Differential] D4508: Plasma controls based on QtQuickControls2 > > > [Commented On]> > > > > I personally find that having a "vertical" line in which all the > >

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-03-01 Thread Michael Pyne
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 08:38:12PM +0100, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > [Differential] D4508: Plasma controls based on QtQuickControls2 > > [Commented On] > > > > I personally find that having a "vertical" line in which all the subjects > > of the differential emails start makes it much easier to

Re: Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-02-28 Thread Ivan Čukić
> [Differential] D4508: Plasma controls based on QtQuickControls2 [Commented > On] > > I personally find that having a "vertical" line in which all the subjects of > the differential emails start makes it much easier to read. +1 I'd even shorten The 'Differential' part of it to just 'Diff'.

Differential e-mail subject re-arrangement

2017-02-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
What do you think about rearranging the subject to move the [Commented On] [Changed Subscribers] [Accepted] [Updated, 2,978 lines] etc from the beginning to the end, i.e. [Differential] [Updated, 2,978 lines] D4508: Plasma controls based on QtQuickControls2 [Differential] [Commented On]