On Friday, July 31, 2015 07:15:55 PM Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 July 2015 20:46:24 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1]
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
> On Friday 31 July 2015 21:27:45 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > So the one thing we know fairly certain right now is that MSVC 2012 is
> not
> > going to be the deal breaker here.
> > I'm still not 100% sure about GCC and Clang though..
>
> Well, the p
On Friday 31 July 2015 21:27:45 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> So the one thing we know fairly certain right now is that MSVC 2012 is not
> going to be the deal breaker here.
> I'm still not 100% sure about GCC and Clang though..
Well, the pages you linked to in your earlier email said GCC supports rvalue
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 7:50 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1].
> >
> > The status of move semantics when searching for the status of N3053 on
> the
> > compilers that frameworks support:
> > G
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1].
>
> The status of move semantics when searching for the status of N3053 on the
> compilers that frameworks support:
> GCC 4.6 [2] (frameworks requires 4.5)
> CLANG 3.0 [3] (frameworks requi
On Friday 31 July 2015 19:15:55 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> What i mean with "move semantics" are mainly the following features:
> - std::move
> - move copy constructor
> - move assignment operator
>
> I know std::move is in vs2010, i'm just not so sure about the move copy and
> assignment
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Alex Merry wrote:
> On Thursday 30 July 2015 20:46:24 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1].
> > >
> > > The status of move semantics when searching for the s
On Friday 31 July 2015 15:11:56 Alex Merry wrote:
> So when you say "move semantics", what does that encompass? You can use
> rvalue references in 2010 just fine, but someone would need to check that
> Qt detects that properly and provides appropriate overloads of various
> methods, and you may not
On Thursday 30 July 2015 20:46:24 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1].
> >
> > The status of move semantics when searching for the status of N3053 on the
> > compilers that frameworks support:
> >
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1].
>
> The status of move semantics when searching for the status of N3053 on the
> compilers that frameworks support:
> GCC 4.6 [2] (frameworks requires 4.5)
> CLANG 3.0 [3] (frameworks requ
Hi,
The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1].
The status of move semantics when searching for the status of N3053 on the
compilers that frameworks support:
GCC 4.6 [2] (frameworks requires 4.5)
CLANG 3.0 [3] (frameworks requires 3.1)
Visual Studio 2010/2012 [4] (it has some (most?) move sema
11 matches
Mail list logo
