On Tuesday 16 September 2014 14:19:44 Marco Martin wrote:
right now all the classes are still under the Plasma namespace, and should
probably be renamed and cmakes to be cleaned up (especially because it would
be used by plasma too to the two identically named classes, new and
deprecated would
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 11:06:50 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Is the name ok for everybody? potential name clashes?
as it used to be namespaces before, what about using a namespace KPackage
and just call the classes:
KPackage::Package
KPackage::PackageStructure
KPackage::PackageTrader
On Wednesday, September 17, 2014 11:20:10 Marco Martin wrote:
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 11:06:50 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
Is the name ok for everybody? potential name clashes?
as it used to be namespaces before, what about using a namespace KPackage
and just call the classes:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
right now all the classes are still under the Plasma namespace, and should
probably be renamed and cmakes to be cleaned up (especially because it
would
be used by plasma too to the two identically named classes, new and
On Wednesday 17 September 2014 17:02:02 Vishesh Handa wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com wrote:
right now all the classes are still under the Plasma namespace, and should
probably be renamed and cmakes to be cleaned up (especially because it
would
be
Hi all,
first, brief introductionon what this is:
during a Bof about scripting in applications at Akademy it occurred that some
applications may be interested by the functionality provided by
Plasma::Package, provided it was on a lower tier.
Since I already had kindof the idea of making Package
