Re: KAuth buildability: new CI architecture

2017-04-17 Thread Harald Sitter
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> Would it be possible to use relative-to-calling-binary paths? > > > Simply put: no. That would require quite some engineering effort especially > considering that distros do have the libexec paths different with some >

Re: KAuth buildability: new CI architecture

2017-04-17 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 2017-04-17 06:49, schrieb Ben Cooksley: On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: Am 2017-04-16 13:52, schrieb Ben Cooksley: On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Harald Sitter wrote: Not particularly related to the issue at hand (which is

Re: KAuth buildability: new CI architecture

2017-04-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Am 2017-04-16 13:52, schrieb Ben Cooksley: >> >> On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Harald Sitter wrote: >>> >>> Not particularly related to the issue at hand (which is probably >>> polkitqt having meh

Re: KAuth buildability: new CI architecture

2017-04-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Am 2017-04-16 13:52, schrieb Ben Cooksley: On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Harald Sitter wrote: Not particularly related to the issue at hand (which is probably polkitqt having meh cmake files), but relocating stuff in general is sper unreliable and I would absolutely

Re: KAuth buildability: new CI architecture

2017-04-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Harald Sitter wrote: > Not particularly related to the issue at hand (which is probably > polkitqt having meh cmake files), but relocating stuff in general is > sper unreliable and I would absolutely advise against it as it can > easily screw

Re: KAuth buildability: new CI architecture

2017-04-16 Thread Harald Sitter
Not particularly related to the issue at hand (which is probably polkitqt having meh cmake files), but relocating stuff in general is sper unreliable and I would absolutely advise against it as it can easily screw up test results and builds alike, often in unobvious ways (all it takes is a bit

KAuth buildability: new CI architecture

2017-04-15 Thread Ben Cooksley
Hi all, As some will be aware i've been working on a new architecture for the CI system which will solve a number of the problems we currently have with the current iteration. The new design should allow us to: 1) Use different base systems for different groupings of projects 2) Will eliminate