Dear KDE developers,
For my GSoC 2016 project at KDE (Lite version of KStars for mobile devices)
I need to access C++ class generated from XML configure file with KConfig
compiler from QML. I found in this patch
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123367/
and in the source code of KConfig compiler t
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Artem Fedoskin wrote:
> Dear KDE developers,
>
> For my GSoC 2016 project at KDE (Lite version of KStars for mobile devices)
> I need to access C++ class generated from XML configure file with KConfig
> compiler from QML. I found in this patch
> https://git.reviewbo
Hi Aleix,
I'm sorry for late reply. I was trying to compile KStars for Android and
struggled a bit with compiling KF5.
1. I don't know whether this is a problem or a feature - When I compile
my app for Android and use KConfig compiled for Android the ARM version
of kconfig_compiler is ex
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Artem Fedoskin wrote:
> Hi Aleix,
>
> I'm sorry for late reply. I was trying to compile KStars for Android and
> struggled a bit with compiling KF5.
>
> 1. I don't know whether this is a problem or a feature - When I compile my app
> for Android and use KConfig com
Hi Aleix,
Thank you for the reply. I was able to compile KStars for Android because
the mentor of my project got rid of KIO.
> Use KF5_HOST_TOOLING variable to point to your host tooling.
It worked perfectly.
Regards, Artem
2016-05-15 10:31 GMT+02:00 Aleix Pol :
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 1:02
On mardi 10 mai 2016 16:49:57 CEST Aleix Pol wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Artem Fedoskin wrote:
> > Dear KDE developers,
> >
> > For my GSoC 2016 project at KDE (Lite version of KStars for mobile
> > devices)
> > I need to access C++ class generated from XML configure file with KConfi
>>> We could also start with turning that into quint64, to already double
the number of possible settings, right? Easy short term fix.
Am I correct that with quint64 we will gain just 32 more additional unique
signal bit masks? The problem is that my config file has more than 300.
I managed to ma
On jeudi 26 mai 2016 02:31:29 CEST Artem Fedoskin wrote:
> >>> We could also start with turning that into quint64, to already double
>
> the number of possible settings, right? Easy short term fix.
>
> Am I correct that with quint64 we will gain just 32 more additional unique
> signal bit masks?
