Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-06-01 Thread Alex Merry
On 26/04/14 23:32, Kevin Ottens wrote: Please get back to us when you're done checking your framework, if you get any issue or if something is unclear. Alex Merry: - kdesignerplugin - kimageformats - kmediaplayer (porting aid) All checked. Alex

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-29 Thread Vishesh Handa
On Sunday, April 27, 2014 12:32:25 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: No maintainer: - krunner (porting aid) I'm willing to maintain krunner. -- Vishesh Handa ___ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-29 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 12:40:16 Vishesh Handa wrote: On Sunday, April 27, 2014 12:32:25 AM Kevin Ottens wrote: No maintainer: - krunner (porting aid) I'm willing to maintain krunner. Please add vhanda to the maintainer key in the metainfo.yaml file then. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens,

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-29 Thread John Layt
On 26 April 2014 23:32, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org wrote: John Layt: - kunitconversion The only thing left is the move of KCurrencyCode back to kdelibs4support. I've now done up patches, but I'm once again bamboozled by Reviewboard and post-review and feel like a total idiot. I should just

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-29 Thread Alex Merry
On 29/04/14 13:48, John Layt wrote: On 26 April 2014 23:32, Kevin Ottens er...@kde.org mailto:er...@kde.org wrote: John Layt: - kunitconversion The only thing left is the move of KCurrencyCode back to kdelibs4support. I've now done up patches, but I'm once again bamboozled

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-29 Thread John Layt
On 29 April 2014 14:16, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote: You are working on a separate branch as that wiki page suggests, right? It wouldn't surpise me if using the --parent=master option from the master branch gave you no changes. I've tried both from the local master branch and a

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-29 Thread Alex Merry
On 29/04/14 14:35, John Layt wrote: Using rbt post has the same result, but at least has more verbose error messages: One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API Error 105) path: error: unable to find 1db2612bdc625b7267d31ce773ecfdcddc6ae045 fatal: git cat-file

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-29 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 1:45 AM, Alex Merry alex.me...@kde.org wrote: On 29/04/14 14:35, John Layt wrote: Using rbt post has the same result, but at least has more verbose error messages: One or more fields had errors (HTTP 400, API Error 105) path: error: unable to find

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-28 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 27 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: Marco Martin: - kdeclarative - plasma-framework I think it's pretty fine on my part, i'll take another review on the metadata files. one thing I think i need are toplevel bugzilla products for each framework, right? (if so i'll open a sysadmin

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday 28 April 2014 13:32:08 Marco Martin wrote: On Sunday 27 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: Marco Martin: - kdeclarative - plasma-framework I think it's pretty fine on my part, i'll take another review on the metadata files. one thing I think i need are toplevel

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-28 Thread Ivan Čukić
Hi, Should we create a new component in bko, or we can rename the existing one (kactivities - frameworks-kactivities)? (I did the former, but wanted to check) The same question for the revboard - should the repository be renamed to frameworks-kactivities? The only thing that I'm having issues

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello, On Monday 28 April 2014 16:32:41 Ivan Čukić wrote: Should we create a new component in bko, or we can rename the existing one (kactivities - frameworks-kactivities)? (I did the former, but wanted to check) Whatever works for you. The same question for the revboard - should the

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-28 Thread Marco Martin
On Monday 28 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: Martin Klapetek did that for all frameworks a while back. All the frameworks related products are prefixed with frameworks-. Looks like your modules got moved after that and so are indeed missing. You think right, you need to add them to bugzilla.

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-28 Thread David Faure
On Monday 28 April 2014 16:32:41 Ivan Čukić wrote: Hi, Should we create a new component in bko, or we can rename the existing one (kactivities - frameworks-kactivities)? (I did the former, but wanted to check) The same question for the revboard - should the repository be renamed to

Re: KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-28 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Monday 28 April 2014 18:13:44 Marco Martin wrote: On Monday 28 April 2014, Kevin Ottens wrote: Martin Klapetek did that for all frameworks a while back. All the frameworks related products are prefixed with frameworks-. Looks like your modules got moved after that and so are indeed

KF5 Maintainers: Please get ready for release

2014-04-27 Thread Kevin Ottens
Hello framework maintainers, As you know we're getting near the final release. If we don't hit a critical issue, we'll release the final early June. Before that, we'll have a second beta on May 4th, and we'd like it to look as close to the final as possible. That's why I'm sending you this