Le 18 mai 2017 02:11, "Aleix Pol" a écrit :
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Matthieu Gallien
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As a follow up of a discussion on android list, I would like to gather
some
> comments or point of views about the following dilemma.
> Currently, the mandatory parts of KFileMetaDat
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Matthieu Gallien
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As a follow up of a discussion on android list, I would like to gather some
> comments or point of views about the following dilemma.
> Currently, the mandatory parts of KFileMetaData compile for Android using API
> level 21 (An
Hello,
As a follow up of a discussion on android list, I would like to gather some
comments or point of views about the following dilemma.
Currently, the mandatory parts of KFileMetaData compile for Android using API
level 21 (Android 5.0). The class UserMetaData is relying on extended
attribut