Re: KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems

2021-04-06 Thread David Redondo
Hi, I agree that it's most useful on plasma. >On systems that do not use X11 (Windows, macOS, Android) it >is most likely not useful at all. There exists code for mac and windows but I don't know either if it's working or just a dummy so it compiles. Also for everyone interested in the topic,

Re: KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems

2021-04-06 Thread Aleix Pol
en apps call some API of KGlobalAccel which > results in the kglobalaccel5 process to be DBus-activated. > > This brings me to the question of whether there is a use case for using > KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems at all. While technically > KGlobalAccel should work on all X11 sys

Re: KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems

2021-04-06 Thread Nicolas Fella
This seems to happen when apps call some API of KGlobalAccel which results in the kglobalaccel5 process to be DBus-activated. This brings me to the question of whether there is a use case for using KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems at all. While technically KGlobalAccel should work on all X

Re: KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems

2021-04-06 Thread Konstantin Kharlamov
to be DBus-activated. > > This brings me to the question of whether there is a use case for using > KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems at all. While technically > KGlobalAccel should work on all X11 systems most (all?) desktop > environments have their own way of global shortcut han

KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems

2021-04-06 Thread Nicolas Fella
-activated. This brings me to the question of whether there is a use case for using KGlobalAccel on non-Plasma systems at all. While technically KGlobalAccel should work on all X11 systems most (all?) desktop environments have their own way of global shortcut handling that we should not interfere with