Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-11 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2013-07-10, Kevin Ottens ervin+bluesyst...@kde.org wrote: OK thanks for the clarification. I don't know where I got that impressi= on that=20 QtScript and Qml were using the same JS engine then... it was that way in qt4 :) /Sune ___

Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-10 Thread Chusslove Illich
[: Kevin Ottens :] [ki18n not being tier 1] Means the set of frameworks which will use ki18n will be reduced though. Maybe not a big deal, our needs for advanced i18n features are likely not as high there than in applications (I'm unsure about that statement honestly). I'm not terribly

Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-10 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 13:30:17 Chusslove Illich wrote: [: Kevin Ottens :] For locale it should be QLocale really. KLocale is likely to disappear at some point. QLocale might not fulfill all your needs yet, but we'd need to know what you miss sooner than later. I don't have in mind

KIO progress towards tier 1 framework? (resend)

2013-07-02 Thread Mark
Hi, When i'm looking in the kdelibs splitting document [1] i only see KIO pop up twice. One to get kbookmarks out of KIO (which is work in progress). Another one with kio-core as work in progress. But i can't find any documentation anywhere that gives me a clear view as to how far KIO is on it's

Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-02 Thread David Faure
Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 13:49:01 Mark a écrit : Hi, When i'm looking in the kdelibs splitting document [1] i only see KIO pop up twice. One to get kbookmarks out of KIO (which is work in progress). Another one with kio-core as work in progress. Right. But i can't find any documentation

Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-02 Thread Kevin Ottens
On Tuesday 02 July 2013 14:06:37 David Faure wrote: KIO can't be tier1 though: kio core depends on kcoreaddons (for KJob), on KConfig and on ki18n. (and on kservice for some strange default-user-agent feature, maybe we can change that) That makes it tier2 if we can remove the kservice

Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-02 Thread Mark
** ahh, so we're continuing in this message after all instead of KIO progress towards tier 1 framework? (resend). ** On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:06 PM, David Faure fa...@kde.org wrote: Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 13:49:01 Mark a écrit : Hi, When i'm looking in the kdelibs splitting document [1] i

Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-02 Thread Chusslove Illich
[: Stephen Kelly :] As far as I understand, the ki18n library does not depend on a javascript engine, but only the separate ktranscript plugin does? It is not really separate, it is in plugin form only as an internal optimization detail (languages which don't use it don't pay the memory/

Re: KIO progress towards tier 1 framework?

2013-07-02 Thread David Faure
Le mardi 2 juillet 2013 21:35:13 Mark a écrit : ** ahh, so we're continuing in this message after all instead of KIO progress towards tier 1 framework? (resend). ** No, this was a reply to your message on k-f-d. I just removed the resend in my reply, it didn't make sense for the reply