Re: Postfixing .po that come from Qt::tr() with a _qt.po

2014-04-12 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Divendres, 11 d'abril de 2014, a les 01:36:12, Aurélien Gâteau va escriure: On Thu, Apr 10, 2014, at 14:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, do you think it makes sense to use that postfix? We are using this currently for stuff like marble and trojita so our translators know they can't

Re: Postfixing .po that come from Qt::tr() with a _qt.po

2014-04-11 Thread Aurélien Gâteau
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014, at 14:17, Albert Astals Cid wrote: Hi, do you think it makes sense to use that postfix? We are using this currently for stuff like marble and trojita so our translators know they can't use advanced stuff like JS scripting for the translations. What do you think?

Postfixing .po that come from Qt::tr() with a _qt.po

2014-04-10 Thread Albert Astals Cid
Hi, do you think it makes sense to use that postfix? We are using this currently for stuff like marble and trojita so our translators know they can't use advanced stuff like JS scripting for the translations. What do you think? Cheers, Albert ___

Re: Postfixing .po that come from Qt::tr() with a _qt.po

2014-04-10 Thread Chusslove Illich
[: Albert Astals Cid :] Hi, do you think it makes sense to use that postfix? We are using this currently for stuff like marble and trojita so our translators know they can't use advanced stuff like JS scripting for the translations. For this particular reason, the better solution is to make