Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-08 Thread Commit Hook
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/ --- (Updated Sept. 9, 2013, 4:13 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-04 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Sept. 4, 2013, 9:26 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: Here's a diff fixing the issues: diff --git a/find-modules/FindXCB.cmake b/find-modules/FindXCB.cmake index 2684ed0..823d167 100644 --- a/find-modules/FindXCB.cmake +++ b/find-modules/FindXCB.cmake @@ -60,9 +60,15 @@

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-04 Thread Stephen Kelly
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/#review39317 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Stephen Kelly On Sept. 4, 2013, 7:45

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Aug. 27, 2013, 6:08 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: find-modules/FindXCB.cmake, line 184 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/diff/1/?file=183395#file183395line184 I don't think 'NAMES lib' is correct. That will search for a lib named 'lib' with certain patterns, eg liblib.so.

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Aug. 27, 2013, 4:08 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: find-modules/FindXCB.cmake, line 184 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/diff/1/?file=183395#file183395line184 I don't think 'NAMES lib' is correct. That will search for a lib named 'lib' with certain patterns, eg liblib.so.

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/ --- (Updated Sept. 3, 2013, 9:37 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks,

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Stephen Kelly
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/#review39235 --- Thanks. Copying what I wrote before: You wrote that it

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Sept. 3, 2013, 8:07 a.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: Thanks. Copying what I wrote before: You wrote that it allows having some components be optional, and others be required. However, you don't seem to follow the advice here to do that:

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Stephen Kelly
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/#review39244 --- find-modules/FindXCB.cmake

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Sept. 3, 2013, 11:40 a.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: find-modules/FindXCB.cmake, line 187 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/diff/2/?file=186650#file186650line187 Is it even possible to hit these fatal errors? I thought find_path and find_library would always set the variable

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Stephen Kelly
On Sept. 3, 2013, 9:40 a.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: find-modules/FindXCB.cmake, line 187 http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/diff/2/?file=186650#file186650line187 Is it even possible to hit these fatal errors? I thought find_path and find_library would always set the variable

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-09-03 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/ --- (Updated Sept. 4, 2013, 6:57 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks,

Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-08-19 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alexander Neundorf. Description

Re: Review Request 112151: Use components in FindXCB

2013-08-19 Thread Kevin Ottens
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112151/ --- (Updated Aug. 19, 2013, 9:39 a.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks,