On Nov. 15, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Why do you need to drop the version? In similar cases we've been bumping to
5...
Kevin Ottens wrote:
Yeah I'm surprised as well... OTOH that's a regular library, we don't
mention the version name for those (unlike for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113883/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kdelibs
Description
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113883/#review43729
---
Why do you need to drop the version? In similar cases we've
On Nov. 15, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Why do you need to drop the version? In similar cases we've been bumping to
5...
Yeah I'm surprised as well... OTOH that's a regular library, we don't mention
the version name for those (unlike for executables like kded)
- Kevin
On Nov. 15, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Why do you need to drop the version? In similar cases we've been bumping to
5...
Kevin Ottens wrote:
Yeah I'm surprised as well... OTOH that's a regular library, we don't
mention the version name for those (unlike for
On Nov. 15, 2013, 12:32 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Why do you need to drop the version? In similar cases we've been bumping to
5...
Kevin Ottens wrote:
Yeah I'm surprised as well... OTOH that's a regular library, we don't
mention the version name for those (unlike for
On Nov. 15, 2013, 1:32 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
Why do you need to drop the version? In similar cases we've been bumping to
5...
Kevin Ottens wrote:
Yeah I'm surprised as well... OTOH that's a regular library, we don't
mention the version name for those (unlike for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113883/
---
(Updated Nov. 15, 2013, 9:10 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
