Re: Review Request 117985: frameworks/kjs: add missing man page docbook

2015-02-13 Thread Burkhard Lück
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/ --- (Updated Feb. 13, 2015, 1:29 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 117985: frameworks/kjs: add missing man page docbook

2014-06-17 Thread Kevin Ottens
On May 5, 2014, 7:17 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: IIRC that was intentional as to not have kjs depend on kdoctools. Alex Merry wrote: Hrm. Distros like Debian aren't going to be super-happy about this. And KJS is officially a porting aid, so I'm not sure bumping it to tier 3 is that

Re: Review Request 117985: frameworks/kjs: add missing man page docbook

2014-05-29 Thread Alex Merry
On May 5, 2014, 7:17 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote: IIRC that was intentional as to not have kjs depend on kdoctools. Hrm. Distros like Debian aren't going to be super-happy about this. And KJS is officially a porting aid, so I'm not sure bumping it to tier 3 is that big of an issue (especially

Re: Review Request 117985: frameworks/kjs: add missing man page docbook

2014-05-05 Thread Kevin Ottens
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/#review57287 --- IIRC that was intentional as to not have kjs depend on

Review Request 117985: frameworks/kjs: add missing man page docbook

2014-05-04 Thread Burkhard Lück
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117985/ --- Review request for Documentation and KDE Frameworks. Repository: kjs