---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120217/
---
(Updated Sept. 16, 2014, 9:48 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been d
> On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:28 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > If we merge, we should imo merge in NetWinInfo - having the same function
> > return different values in NetWinInfo and KWindowInfo feels wrong.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I considered it, but decided against it as I consider NETWi
> On Sept. 15, 2014, 10:28 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > If we merge, we should imo merge in NetWinInfo - having the same function
> > return different values in NetWinInfo and KWindowInfo feels wrong.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I considered it, but decided against it as I consider NET
> On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:28 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > If we merge, we should imo merge in NetWinInfo - having the same function
> > return different values in NetWinInfo and KWindowInfo feels wrong.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I considered it, but decided against it as I consider NETWi
> On Sept. 15, 2014, 10:28 nachm., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > If we merge, we should imo merge in NetWinInfo - having the same function
> > return different values in NetWinInfo and KWindowInfo feels wrong.
>
> Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I considered it, but decided against it as I consider NET
> On Sept. 16, 2014, 12:28 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> > If we merge, we should imo merge in NetWinInfo - having the same function
> > return different values in NetWinInfo and KWindowInfo feels wrong.
I considered it, but decided against it as I consider NETWinInfo to be a level
lower to X
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120217/#review66618
---
If we merge, we should imo merge in NetWinInfo - having the sa
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/120217/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks and kwin.
Repository: kwindowsystem
D