---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124328/
---
(Updated July 11, 2015, 9:25 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Aur
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124328/#review82368
---
I don't understand hieroglyphs. :/
In any case, if you have i
> On July 11, 2015, 10:22 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > I don't understand hieroglyphs. :/
> >
> > In any case, if you have it figured out, it makes sense to me to support
> > another format, even if probably nobody is going to ever use man for KF
> > documentation.
troff is pretty stan
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124328/#review82378
---
Ship it!
For all that troff is dark magic, the important part
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124328/
---
(Updated July 12, 2015, 4 p.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks, Alex M
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124328/#review82394
---
hmm.. I sorta against committing roff code into our repository
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124328/#review82397
---
I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then transl
> On jul. 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
Correct.
- Albert
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, vi
> On Lug. 12, 2015, 6:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a dependency on kdoctools.
On the other
> On July 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
> On July 12, 2015, 4:31 p.m., Allen Winter wrote:
> > hmm.. I sorta against committing roff code into our repository. Since very
> > few people will be able to understand it in this day and age.
> >
> > perhaps you can write the "source" for the man pages in pod and convert
> > them to roff
> On jul. 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
> On July 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
> On July 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
> On July 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
> On July 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
> On July 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124328/
---
(Updated July 15, 2015, 5:48 a.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
> On July 12, 2015, 4:45 p.m., Kevin Krammer wrote:
> > I thought our man pages are written in docbook and then translated by the
> > usual docbook workflow?
>
> Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> Correct.
>
> Luigi Toscano wrote:
> Yes, because they can be translated. But that means a depende
19 matches
Mail list logo
