Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-24 Thread Olivier Churlaud
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127747/ --- (Updated May 24, 2016, 9:10 a.m.) Status -- This change has been

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-22 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On May 20, 2016, 3:50 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > I've looked at the code itself and it seems reasonable, so from that > > perspective and given the length of time there's been no -1's, I think it's > > safe to commit. > > > > However you mentioned in the description that this isn't safe

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-21 Thread Michael Pyne
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127747/#review95686 --- Ship it! Well I'm not the Maintainer of All Frameworks

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-20 Thread Ben Cooksley
> On May 20, 2016, 1:50 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > I've looked at the code itself and it seems reasonable, so from that > > perspective and given the length of time there's been no -1's, I think it's > > safe to commit. > > > > However you mentioned in the description that this isn't safe

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-20 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On May 20, 2016, 3:50 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > I've looked at the code itself and it seems reasonable, so from that > > perspective and given the length of time there's been no -1's, I think it's > > safe to commit. > > > > However you mentioned in the description that this isn't safe

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-20 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On May 20, 2016, 3:50 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > I've looked at the code itself and it seems reasonable, so from that > > perspective and given the length of time there's been no -1's, I think it's > > safe to commit. > > > > However you mentioned in the description that this isn't safe

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-19 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On May 20, 2016, 3:50 a.m., Michael Pyne wrote: > > I've looked at the code itself and it seems reasonable, so from that > > perspective and given the length of time there's been no -1's, I think it's > > safe to commit. > > > > However you mentioned in the description that this isn't safe

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-14 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On April 28, 2016, 10:02 a.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > Any other feedback? What should I do? > > Allen Winter wrote: > I suppose I need to find the time to test this out on the actual > api.kde.org machine. can I run it on the old KDE4 kdelibs KDE/4.14 branch? > > Olivier Churlaud

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-10 Thread Ben Cooksley
> On April 28, 2016, 8:02 a.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > Any other feedback? What should I do? > > Allen Winter wrote: > I suppose I need to find the time to test this out on the actual > api.kde.org machine. can I run it on the old KDE4 kdelibs KDE/4.14 branch? > > Olivier Churlaud

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-10 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On April 28, 2016, 10:02 a.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > Any other feedback? What should I do? > > Allen Winter wrote: > I suppose I need to find the time to test this out on the actual > api.kde.org machine. can I run it on the old KDE4 kdelibs KDE/4.14 branch? > > Olivier Churlaud

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-09 Thread Albert Astals Cid
> On April 28, 2016, 8:02 a.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > Any other feedback? What should I do? > > Allen Winter wrote: > I suppose I need to find the time to test this out on the actual > api.kde.org machine. can I run it on the old KDE4 kdelibs KDE/4.14 branch? > > Olivier Churlaud

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-05-04 Thread Olivier Churlaud
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127747/#review95148 --- Nothing? What should I do? - Olivier Churlaud On avr.

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-04-28 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On April 28, 2016, 10:02 a.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > Any other feedback? What should I do? > > Allen Winter wrote: > I suppose I need to find the time to test this out on the actual > api.kde.org machine. can I run it on the old KDE4 kdelibs KDE/4.14 branch? Sadly enough it won't

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-04-28 Thread Allen Winter
> On April 28, 2016, 8:02 a.m., Olivier Churlaud wrote: > > Any other feedback? What should I do? I suppose I need to find the time to test this out on the actual api.kde.org machine. can I run it on the old KDE4 kdelibs KDE/4.14 branch? - Allen

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-04-28 Thread Olivier Churlaud
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127747/#review94943 --- Any other feedback? What should I do? - Olivier Churlaud

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-04-26 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On April 26, 2016, 1:16 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > metainfo.yaml, line 13 > > > > > > This is already in line 3, doesn't seem like a good idea to duplicate > > the information. > > Olivier Churlaud

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-04-26 Thread Olivier Churlaud
> On April 26, 2016, 1:16 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > metainfo.yaml, line 13 > > > > > > This is already in line 3, doesn't seem like a good idea to duplicate > > the information. There is no "Tier" in

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-04-25 Thread Albert Astals Cid
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127747/#review94845 --- metainfo.yaml (line 13)

Re: Review Request 127747: Create a new script that generate the documentation for all projects following the syntax I proposed

2016-04-25 Thread Olivier Churlaud
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127747/ --- (Updated April 25, 2016, 10:49 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks,