---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127906/
---
Review request for Documentation, KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
Reposit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127906/#review95451
---
I don't have a strong opinion on whether to keep it or not, b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127906/#review95452
---
Then we need to remove all references to qt5options (for exam
> On Mai 13, 2016, 2:14 nachm., David Faure wrote:
> > I don't have a strong opinion on whether to keep it or not, but note that
> > your reasoning is incomplete. A lot of command-line options have moved up
> > to the base classes QGuiApplication and QCoreApplication.
Thanks for the hint David
> On Mai 13, 2016, 2:16 nachm., Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > Then we need to remove all references to qt5options (for example from
> > kf5options).
> > We have the question about kf5options which comes immediately after.
> >
> > It would be interesting to know if the (updated) content of qt5options
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127906/#review95890
---
If we want to provide a qt5options manpage we need at least t
