---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128437/
---
(Updated Sept. 28, 2016, 1:48 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been m
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128437/#review99619
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Marco Martin
On Sept. 28, 2016, 10:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128437/
---
(Updated Sept. 28, 2016, 10:36 a.m.)
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128437/#review99609
---
+1 from me as well.
maybe the distributions need to adapt, on
> On July 13, 2016, 12:43 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > +1 to the idea
> >
> > However, will this mean we get this awful apport "something crashed, now or
> > in the past" tray icon in addition to Drkonqi?
>
> Harald Sitter wrote:
> yes. its upon ubuntu to make that go away though as th
> On Juli 13, 2016, 12:43 nachm., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > +1 to the idea
> >
> > However, will this mean we get this awful apport "something crashed, now or
> > in the past" tray icon in addition to Drkonqi?
>
> Harald Sitter wrote:
> yes. its upon ubuntu to make that go away though as
> On July 13, 2016, 12:43 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > +1 to the idea
> >
> > However, will this mean we get this awful apport "something crashed, now or
> > in the past" tray icon in addition to Drkonqi?
>
> Harald Sitter wrote:
> yes. its upon ubuntu to make that go away though as th
> On Juli 13, 2016, 12:43 nachm., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > +1 to the idea
> >
> > However, will this mean we get this awful apport "something crashed, now or
> > in the past" tray icon in addition to Drkonqi?
>
> Harald Sitter wrote:
> yes. its upon ubuntu to make that go away though as
> On July 13, 2016, 10:15 p.m., Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I am opposed to this change, because it spams downstream packagers with
> > crash bugs they are usually not qualified to fix. Those few distributions
> > that really do want to get the reports downstream (e.g. RHEL) already
> > explicitly
> On Juli 13, 2016, 10:15 nachm., Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I am opposed to this change, because it spams downstream packagers with
> > crash bugs they are usually not qualified to fix. Those few distributions
> > that really do want to get the reports downstream (e.g. RHEL) already
> > explicit
> On July 13, 2016, 12:43 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > +1 to the idea
> >
> > However, will this mean we get this awful apport "something crashed, now or
> > in the past" tray icon in addition to Drkonqi?
>
> Harald Sitter wrote:
> yes. its upon ubuntu to make that go away though as th
> On July 13, 2016, 10:15 p.m., Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I am opposed to this change, because it spams downstream packagers with
> > crash bugs they are usually not qualified to fix. Those few distributions
> > that really do want to get the reports downstream (e.g. RHEL) already
> > explicitly
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128437/#review97363
---
I am opposed to this change, because it spams downstream pack
> On July 13, 2016, 12:43 p.m., Kai Uwe Broulik wrote:
> > +1 to the idea
> >
> > However, will this mean we get this awful apport "something crashed, now or
> > in the past" tray icon in addition to Drkonqi?
yes. its upon ubuntu to make that go away though as their use case is more
involved.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128437/#review97345
---
+1 to the idea
However, will this mean we get this awful app
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128437/
---
Review request for KDE Frameworks.
Repository: kcrash
Description
-
16 matches
Mail list logo
