On Friday 01 January 2016 18:07:59 Ivan Čukić wrote:
>
> So, applications that do link to activities will run and work
> uninterrupted even if the service is not present.
OK, sounds good to me.
--
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE Frameworks 5
___
> Shouldn't the service be part of the framework?
> How usable is the framework without the service?
> Compiling is good, but running is even better :-)
This is the reason why the split has not happened before.
The purpose of the library is:
[1] - to report document/resource events to the service
Sounds good overall, but one question:
On Sunday 08 November 2015 12:04:54 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> We have a few problems at the moment because all the activities
> components are in a single repository. Sometimes dependencies of the
> service creep up into the library, builds break
Hi everybody,
We have a few problems at the moment because all the activities
components are in a single repository. Sometimes dependencies of the
service creep up into the library, builds break because components
that are meant only for Plasma start requiring Qt versions that Plasma
require, whil
