Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-18 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote: > On Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:10:41 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote: >> >> This would still apply even after the implementation of new scheme for >> dependencies and other build metadata. > > > Where do I learn about these new features? See the m

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-18 Thread Jan Kundrát
On Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:10:41 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote: This would still apply even after the implementation of new scheme for dependencies and other build metadata. Where do I learn about these new features? Cheers, Jan -- Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.fla

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-18 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Marko Käning wrote: > On 18 Sep 2014, at 07:52 , Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> That's not what I meant. I mean we have things like frameworks which require >> only Qt 5.2, but we also have things like e.g. KWin requiring Qt 5.3 (soon >> 5.4). This will require two Qt b

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-17 Thread Marko Käning
On 18 Sep 2014, at 07:52 , Martin Gräßlin wrote: > That's not what I meant. I mean we have things like frameworks which require > only Qt 5.2, but we also have things like e.g. KWin requiring Qt 5.3 (soon > 5.4). This will require two Qt builds, while we currently have only one. But > it doesn'

Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-17 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Thursday 18 September 2014 06:46:53 Marko Käning wrote: > Hi guys, > > On 17 Sep 2014, at 08:32 , Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > If the minimum is 5.2 it would obviously be best to test compile > > frameworks > > against 5.2. But that might make things more difficult on the CI system as > > we have

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-17 Thread Marko Käning
Hi guys, On 17 Sep 2014, at 08:32 , Martin Gräßlin wrote: > If the minimum is 5.2 it would obviously be best to test compile frameworks > against 5.2. But that might make things more difficult on the CI system as we > have software depending on 5.3. this thread makes it seem as if one needs to

Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 20:12:26 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Dimarts, 16 de setembre de 2014, a les 12:37:31, Milian Wolff va escriure: > > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:50:57 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin > > wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 16 Sept

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Albert Astals Cid
El Dimarts, 16 de setembre de 2014, a les 12:37:31, Milian Wolff va escriure: > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:50:57 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote: > > >> I wrote this a bit too quickl

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Milian Wolff
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:50:57 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote: > >> I wrote this a bit too quickly. > >> The correct url is > >> http://build.kde.org/view/External_Deps/job/qt5_master_

Re: Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> I wrote this a bit too quickly. >> The correct url is >> http://build.kde.org/view/External_Deps/job/qt5_master_qt5/ >> >> What the system means by "stable" in the output is that i

Re: Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote: > I wrote this a bit too quickly. > The correct url is > http://build.kde.org/view/External_Deps/job/qt5_master_qt5/ > > What the system means by "stable" in the output is that is the branch > that it should theoretically be building agains

Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:17:37 Ben Cooksley wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: >> > Hi all, >> >> Hi Martin, >> >> > I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which >> > passed on

Re: Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:17:37 Ben Cooksley wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Hi all, > > Hi Martin, > > > I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which > > passed on my setup, but failed on build.kde.org. It turned out that it's

Re: What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Ben Cooksley
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Hi all, Hi Martin, > > I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which passed > on my setup, but failed on build.kde.org. It turned out that it's missing an > xcb_flush(QX11Info::connection()) before blocking in the

What's "qt5-stable" on build.kde.org

2014-09-16 Thread Martin Gräßlin
Hi all, I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which passed on my setup, but failed on build.kde.org. It turned out that it's missing an xcb_flush(QX11Info::connection()) before blocking in the event loop. I fixed this problem in Qt, so I'm wondering: which version is