On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:30 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:10:41 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>>
>> This would still apply even after the implementation of new scheme for
>> dependencies and other build metadata.
>
>
> Where do I learn about these new features?
See the m
On Thursday, 18 September 2014 10:10:41 CEST, Ben Cooksley wrote:
This would still apply even after the implementation of new scheme for
dependencies and other build metadata.
Where do I learn about these new features?
Cheers,
Jan
--
Trojitá, a fast Qt IMAP e-mail client -- http://trojita.fla
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Marko Käning wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2014, at 07:52 , Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>> That's not what I meant. I mean we have things like frameworks which require
>> only Qt 5.2, but we also have things like e.g. KWin requiring Qt 5.3 (soon
>> 5.4). This will require two Qt b
On 18 Sep 2014, at 07:52 , Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> That's not what I meant. I mean we have things like frameworks which require
> only Qt 5.2, but we also have things like e.g. KWin requiring Qt 5.3 (soon
> 5.4). This will require two Qt builds, while we currently have only one. But
> it doesn'
On Thursday 18 September 2014 06:46:53 Marko Käning wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On 17 Sep 2014, at 08:32 , Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > If the minimum is 5.2 it would obviously be best to test compile
> > frameworks
> > against 5.2. But that might make things more difficult on the CI system as
> > we have
Hi guys,
On 17 Sep 2014, at 08:32 , Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> If the minimum is 5.2 it would obviously be best to test compile frameworks
> against 5.2. But that might make things more difficult on the CI system as we
> have software depending on 5.3.
this thread makes it seem as if one needs to
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 20:12:26 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> El Dimarts, 16 de setembre de 2014, a les 12:37:31, Milian Wolff va
escriure:
> > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:50:57 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin
>
> wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 16 Sept
El Dimarts, 16 de setembre de 2014, a les 12:37:31, Milian Wolff va escriure:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:50:57 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin
wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> > >> I wrote this a bit too quickl
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:50:57 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> >> I wrote this a bit too quickly.
> >> The correct url is
> >> http://build.kde.org/view/External_Deps/job/qt5_master_
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> I wrote this a bit too quickly.
>> The correct url is
>> http://build.kde.org/view/External_Deps/job/qt5_master_qt5/
>>
>> What the system means by "stable" in the output is that i
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:23:54 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> I wrote this a bit too quickly.
> The correct url is
> http://build.kde.org/view/External_Deps/job/qt5_master_qt5/
>
> What the system means by "stable" in the output is that is the branch
> that it should theoretically be building agains
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:17:37 Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> > I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which
>> > passed on
On Tuesday 16 September 2014 21:17:37 Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> > I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which
> > passed on my setup, but failed on build.kde.org. It turned out that it's
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Martin,
>
> I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which passed
> on my setup, but failed on build.kde.org. It turned out that it's missing an
> xcb_flush(QX11Info::connection()) before blocking in the
Hi all,
I just had a little problem with a new autotest for kwindowsystem which passed
on my setup, but failed on build.kde.org. It turned out that it's missing an
xcb_flush(QX11Info::connection()) before blocking in the event loop. I fixed
this problem in Qt, so I'm wondering: which version is
15 matches
Mail list logo