/var/git/kf5/khtml/khtmlview.cpp:36:26: fatal error: qx11info_x11.h: No
such file or directory
compilation terminated.
Also qtx11support is broken, still uses obsolete QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER
___
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde
Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> /var/git/kf5/khtml/khtmlview.cpp:36:26: fatal error: qx11info_x11.h: No
> such file or directory
> compilation terminated.
>
> Also qtx11support is broken, still uses obsolete QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER
Please make sure you are using codereview.qt-project.org:qt/qtx11extras.
On Sunday 10 February 2013 09:33:45 Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> /var/git/kf5/khtml/khtmlview.cpp:36:26: fatal error: qx11info_x11.h: No
> such file or directory
> compilation terminated.
Fixed.
> Also qtx11support is broken, still uses obsolete QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER
What's qtx11support? Do you mean
On Sunday 10 February 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > /var/git/kf5/khtml/khtmlview.cpp:36:26: fatal error: qx11info_x11.h: No
> > such file or directory
> > compilation terminated.
> >
> > Also qtx11support is broken, still uses obsolete QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER
>
> Please mak
On Sunday 10 February 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > /var/git/kf5/khtml/khtmlview.cpp:36:26: fatal error: qx11info_x11.h: No
> > such file or directory
> > compilation terminated.
> >
> > Also qtx11support is broken, still uses obsolete QT_{BEGIN,END}_HEADER
>
> Please mak
Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Treeve Jelbert wrote:
>> > /var/git/kf5/khtml/khtmlview.cpp:36:26: fatal error: qx11info_x11.h: No
>> > such file or directory
>> > compilation terminated.
>> >
>> > Also qtx11support is broken, still uses obsolete QT
On Sunday 10 February 2013 15:51:35 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2013, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > > /var/git/kf5/khtml/khtmlview.cpp:36:26: fatal error: qx11info_x11.h: No
> > > such file or directory
> > > compilation terminated.
> > >
> > > Also qtx11
On Sunday 10 February 2013 23:35:53 Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Especially as I see on the wiki link you posted, the recommendation is to
> configure it with tests. Why do we instruct people build all Qt tests?
> That's pure timewasting.
OK, I guess not everyone compiling KF5 will contribute to Qt as
David Faure wrote:
> On Sunday 10 February 2013 23:35:53 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Especially as I see on the wiki link you posted, the recommendation is to
>> configure it with tests. Why do we instruct people build all Qt tests?
>> That's pure timewasting.
>
> OK, I guess not everyone compiling K
