Re: [kde-freebsd] Anyone can use iPod with Amarok2?

2009-04-07 Thread Matt
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Daichi GOTO dai...@ongs.co.jp wrote: Hi amarok lovers ;) Anyone could use iPod with Amarok2? Still I cannot get it. I've only tried this with one device so far (a second generation Shuffle) and it looks like I was stymied by the fact that the GEOM label had a

Re: [kde-freebsd] Qt 4.5 and GNU iconv [SOLUTION]

2009-04-07 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday 07 April 2009 07:25:16 David Johnson wrote: I played around with this, rebuilding libiconv after gettext, but to no effect. Oh well, it was worth a shot... I've managed to get Qt 4.5 to behave well with libiconv. It was a bit of a cheat though. There is also another solution.

Re: [kde-freebsd] x11/kdebase4-workspace - fails: makefile

2009-04-07 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 11:03:23 +0400 Max Brazhnikov m...@freebsd.org wrote: is this MAKE_JOBS_SAFE or QAT failure? Seems to be MAKE_JOBS_SAFE, it build once OK, then it failed, now it built OK. -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable as

Re: [kde-freebsd] Qt 4.5 and GNU iconv [SOLUTION]

2009-04-07 Thread David Johnson
SOLUTION 1: Disable libiconv support altogether. This, I believe, is a viable solution since Windows does not have iconv and we should be using whatever fallback it does. This should result in no loss of functionality. This is what I am doing for non-port builds of 4.5.0. It's also what's

Re: ports/133478: devel/qt4-uic etc. error: �The specified system/compiler is not supported�

2009-04-07 Thread edwin
Synopsis: devel/qt4-uic etc. error: “The specified system/compiler is not supported” Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs-kde Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Apr 8 00:20:22 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign