[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Ed Schouten
Hello all, Just to notify everyone what's going on; Matthias tested a patch for me, which should make it work on HEAD again. The attached patch should be applied to the sources conditionally (so only when running HEAD). I am in the process of getting it fixed in ports/upstreamed. Greetings, --

[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Rob Farmer
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:38, David DEMELIER wrote: > A lot of ports will need some patches then, isn't it ? Most were taken care of back when it happened - many either included utmp.h and never used it or only used it trivially, so it was easy to fix (I submitted patches for some and I'm definit

[kde-freebsd] Re: Patch for kdenetwork3's ktalkd to make it build on FreeBSD HEAD

2010-11-02 Thread Ed Schouten
Right after I sent my message I noticed this line of C code: * Ed Schouten , 20101102 19:20: > if (!(statb.st_mode & 020)) /* ?character device? */ This should of course be rewritten to something like: if (!S_ISCHR(statb.st_mode)) -- Ed S

[kde-freebsd] Patch for kdenetwork3's ktalkd to make it build on FreeBSD HEAD

2010-11-02 Thread Ed Schouten
Hi folks, Even though I thought I fixed most pieces of software to build on FreeBSD HEAD after I replaced with , I noticed kdenetwork3 was still broken. I've attached a patch which at least makes the code build again, but only on FreeBSD HEAD. It should give you folks an impression how the code s

[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Rob Farmer
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 23:14, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD? It has been removed: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-January/014893.html -- Rob Farmer ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-fre

[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, November 02, 2010 a las 08:56:12AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger escribió: > Hi! > > > > > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD? > > > > > > Yes. 9-CURRENT migrated to utmpx. > > > > > > man utmpx > > > > yep; ports/net/kdenetwork3 was not ported to this fact :-( > > > > Is KD

[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > > > > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD? > > > > Yes. 9-CURRENT migrated to utmpx. > > > > man utmpx > > > yep; ports/net/kdenetwork3 was not ported to this fact :-( > > > Is KDE3 still maintained for 9-CURRENT? > > There are only a few apps left that still require KDE3.

[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Mikle Krutov
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 08:56:12AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD? > > > > > > Yes. 9-CURRENT migrated to utmpx. > > > > > > man utmpx > > > > yep; ports/net/kdenetwork3 was not ported to this fact :-( > > > > Is KDE3 still maintained

[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Kurt Jaeger
Hi! > > > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD? > > > > Yes. 9-CURRENT migrated to utmpx. > > > > man utmpx > > yep; ports/net/kdenetwork3 was not ported to this fact :-( > > Is KDE3 still maintained for 9-CURRENT? There are only a few apps left that still require KDE3. Probably it

[kde-freebsd] Re: 9-CURRENT: ports/net/kdenetwork3 does not compile

2010-11-02 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Tuesday, November 02, 2010 a las 07:18:01AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger escribió: > Hi! > > > Something wrong with 'struct utmp ubuf' in HEAD? > > Yes. 9-CURRENT migrated to utmpx. > > man utmpx yep; ports/net/kdenetwork3 was not ported to this fact :-( Is KDE3 still maintained for 9-CURRENT?