[kde-freebsd] Fix 4.10 ports?

2013-10-25 Thread Tijl Coosemans
Hi, Is it worth spending time fixing KDE 4.10 ports for FreeBSD 10.0 or will KDE 4.11 hit the tree soon? ___ kde-freebsd mailing list kde-freebsd@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-freebsd See also http://freebsd.kde.org/ for latest inform

Re: [kde-freebsd] marble

2013-10-25 Thread Adriaan de Groot
On Friday 25 October 2013 07:55:19 Ajtim wrote: > I did disable option for GPS and rebuilt but it crashed again: If there's gpsd still installed on the system, then Marble still picks up that feature (and attendant crashes). You may need to deinstall gpsd before rebuilding Marble. [ade] (who ha

Re: [kde-freebsd] Will there be a Qt5-Port?

2013-10-25 Thread Max Brazhnikov
On Wed, 23 Oct 2013 20:47:20 +0200 Alberto Villa wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 1:05 AM, Schaich Alonso > wrote: > > Replying to this because I asked about qt5 three weeks ago and got no reply. > > Sorry, I missed your email (as well as many others). > > > Some ports for it have been made and

Re: [kde-freebsd] marble

2013-10-25 Thread Schaich Alonso
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 07:55:19 -0400 Ajtim wrote: > On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:53:49 + > Schaich Alonso wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:19:21 -0400 > > Ajtim wrote: > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > I built "marble" with clang on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA1 and when I start > > > it it crashed: > > > > >

Re: [kde-freebsd] marble

2013-10-25 Thread Ajtim
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:53:49 + Schaich Alonso wrote: > On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:19:21 -0400 > Ajtim wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > I built "marble" with clang on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA1 and when I start > > it it crashed: > > > > Application: Marble Virtual Globe (marble), signal: Segmentation > > fau

Re: [kde-freebsd] marble

2013-10-25 Thread Schaich Alonso
On Thu, 24 Oct 2013 19:19:21 -0400 Ajtim wrote: > Hi! > > I built "marble" with clang on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA1 and when I start it > it crashed: > > Application: Marble Virtual Globe (marble), signal: Segmentation fault > [...] > > Do I need to use gcc instead, please? > > Thank you. > > > Mit