mikael.uran...@gmail.com has reassigned Bugzilla Automation
's request for maintainer-feedback to k...@freebsd.org:
Bug 216736: devel/qt5-script
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216736
--- Description ---
Created attachment 179541
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachme
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216736
Bug ID: 216736
Summary: devel/qt5-script
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: arm
URL: http://beefy8.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-armv6-default/
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216735
Bug ID: 216735
Summary: lang/qt5-qml: fails to build on armv6
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: arm
URL: http://beefy8.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-armv6-de
mikael.uran...@gmail.com has reassigned Bugzilla Automation
's request for maintainer-feedback to k...@freebsd.org:
Bug 216735: lang/qt5-qml: fails to build on armv6
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216735
--- Description ---
Created attachment 179540
--> https://bugs.freebsd.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216692
--- Comment #7 from pe...@flytrace.com ---
OK if you think that it's the source of the problem.
This jail was not restarted since a lot of time, there were some apps (not from
ports) that were built here. Probably, one of makefiles set a bad
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216692
--- Comment #6 from Tobias C. Berner ---
As suspected the assimp-test fails :) -- and it falls back to the bundled
assimp.
For some reason it thinks it should use the mkspec freebsd-g++ instead of
freebsd-clang (and fails, because 10.3 doe
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216692
--- Comment #5 from pe...@flytrace.com ---
Created attachment 179528
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=179528&action=edit
config.log
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
