[Bug 216816] [PATCH] devel/qt5: In arch.test, use CXXFLAGS from make environment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216816 --- Comment #12 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #10) FYI: My context was explicitly trying to build lumina and xscreensaver. xscreensaver and what it depends on built for all 3

[Bug 216816] [PATCH] devel/qt5: In arch.test, use CXXFLAGS from make environment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216816 --- Comment #11 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Michal Meloun from comment #8) Note: without the patch what I tried to build indirectly did build the following qt5-* items before failing to build qt5-gui for

[Bug 216816] [PATCH] devel/qt5: In arch.test, use CXXFLAGS from make environment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216816 --- Comment #10 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Tobias C. Berner from comment #9) [Note: My activity has only been doing some test builds, not installing and using what is built. I've not been one testing the patch

[Bug 216816] [PATCH] devel/qt5: In arch.test, use CXXFLAGS from make environment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216816 Tobias C. Berner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,

[Bug 216816] [PATCH] devel/qt5: In arch.test, use CXXFLAGS from make environment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216816 --- Comment #8 from Michal Meloun --- This patch affects many (if not all) of qt5 ports, so you must rebuild all of them. In any case, I can build qt5-gui without problem:

[Bug 216816] [PATCH] devel/qt5: In arch.test, use CXXFLAGS from make environment

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216816 --- Comment #7 from Mark Millard --- Time warp: 206348 < 216816 but 206348 is the closed duplicate of the later 216816. :) I will note here a little of what I reported earlier today in 206348's comment 11: An