[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Adam Weinberger changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|Open

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #13 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: adamw Date: Thu Oct 19 01:05:52 UTC 2017 New revision: 452392 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/452392 Log: MFH: r452391 Check for Qt

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #12 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: adamw Date: Thu Oct 19 01:03:25 UTC 2017 New revision: 452391 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/452391 Log: Check for Qt depends in LOCA

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-16 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |Open --- Comment #11 from Antoine

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Adam Weinberger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #187170|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-15 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #9 from Antoine Brodin --- (In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #8) The charts_LIB and clucene_LIB lines shouldn't be changed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-14 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Adam Weinberger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #187157|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #7 from Antoine Brodin --- (In reply to Adam Weinberger from comment #6) I was suggesting using ${PREFIX}${QT_*REL} and ${LOCALBASE}${QT_*REL} everywhere -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #6 from Adam Weinberger --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #4) Does RUN_DEPENDS handle relative paths? I thought that it did a `which` for anything that doesn't start with a / or have a version specification. -- You

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Adam Weinberger changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #187153|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #4 from Antoine Brodin --- May QT_*DIR should be eliminated and only QT_*DIR_REL allowed to solve the LOCALBASE/PREFIX confusion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #3 from Adam Weinberger --- (In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #2) Ah. I hadn't thought that part through. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|port...@freebsd.org |k...@freebsd.org

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|port...@freebsd.org |k...@freebsd.org

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Antoine Brodin changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|exp-run?| --- Comment #2 from Antoine Brod

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 --- Comment #1 from Antoine Brodin --- The QT_*DIR part is not good, it is where lots of qt ports do install so it should be PREFIX not LOCALBASE. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 222994] Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX

2017-10-13 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=222994 Bug ID: 222994 Summary: Check for qt depends in LOCALBASE, not PREFIX Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any URL: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12666