-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Johnson wrote:
>> Your advice isn't wrong, really, but I wanted to say that I personally
>> found
>> that you CAN keep your old kde3.5/qt3 installation, merely installing qt4
>> and
>> kde4 over the top of it.
>
> There should be zero problems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bartosz Fabianowski wrote:
> Chuck, you succeeded in installing KDE4 and Qt 4.4.3 while Qt 3.5.10 was
> installed. That's known to work.
>
> What David pointed out is that Qt 4.5 cannot be installed that way -
> Nokia/Trolltech seem to have b0rked it
> Your advice isn't wrong, really, but I wanted to say that I personally
> found
> that you CAN keep your old kde3.5/qt3 installation, merely installing qt4
> and
> kde4 over the top of it.
There should be zero problems building Qt-4.4.3 and KDE-4.2.0 when you
have Qt-3.3.8 installed. The problem
Chuck, you succeeded in installing KDE4 and Qt 4.4.3 while Qt 3.5.10 was
installed. That's known to work.
What David pointed out is that Qt 4.5 cannot be installed that way -
Nokia/Trolltech seem to have b0rked it such that the compiler picks up
Qt 3 headers.
- Bartosz
__
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Johnson wrote:
>> Heya
>>
>> I was wondering what the ETA is on Qt 4.5. I am planning to do some work
>> that requires 4.5 and I am wondering whether I should wait for that to
>> hit the ports or install a local copy in my home directory. If 4.5
> Heya
>
> I was wondering what the ETA is on Qt 4.5. I am planning to do some work
> that requires 4.5 and I am wondering whether I should wait for that to
> hit the ports or install a local copy in my home directory. If 4.5 in
> the ports is just around the corner, I will wait; otherwise, I will
Heya
I was wondering what the ETA is on Qt 4.5. I am planning to do some work
that requires 4.5 and I am wondering whether I should wait for that to
hit the ports or install a local copy in my home directory. If 4.5 in
the ports is just around the corner, I will wait; otherwise, I will go
ahead wi
