On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
wrote:
> Not readable for me:
> "Error. You need to be in the admin group to read documents in the user
> prefix."
socghop isn't working properly right now, so I can't go and change
permissions. Meanwhile please see the unformatted versio
Samedi, le 27 mars 2010, à 18:48, Nikhil Marathe a écrit:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Will Stephenson
wrote:
> > Apart from these basic requirements, what upcoming features of HUpnp will
> > you depend upon and how would it affect your proposal if HUpnp feature
> > development slows down?
Samedi, le 27 mars 2010, à 19:30, Nikhil Marathe a écrit:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau
>
> wrote:
> >> As for the UPnP spec, I think that Solid should export a generic UPnP
> >> device system,
> >
> > What do you mean by this? Solid objects which implement a special
Samedi, le 27 mars 2010, à 20:22, Nikhil Marathe a écrit:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Bart Cerneels
wrote:
> > Sorry I didn't reply yet. I have been very busy indeed and also felt
> > the other comments were already in line with my feelings. In short:
> > excellent proposal.
>
> Updated p
On Monday 29 March 2010 10:11:02 Will Stephenson wrote:
> On Saturday 27 March 2010 15:49:28 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Let me recap the reasoning:
> > - Solid::Control was here to allow having different implementations of
> >
> > policy agents in the user session;
> >
> > - The fact is that ther
On Saturday 27 March 2010 12:31:10 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 25 February 2010 19:48:32 Dario Freddi wrote:
> > During Tokamak's Bof, the idea of having a Solid meeting popped up and
> > was quite widely accepted. The topics of the meeting would be the future
> > of Solid, finalizing the wor
On Saturday 27 March 2010 15:49:28 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Let me recap the reasoning:
> - Solid::Control was here to allow having different implementations of
> policy agents in the user session;
> - The fact is that there's really only one of those agents for each type
> (power, network, etc.)
On Saturday 27 March 2010 12:31:10 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Thursday 25 February 2010 19:48:32 Dario Freddi wrote:
> > During Tokamak's Bof, the idea of having a Solid meeting popped up and
> > was quite widely accepted. The topics of the meeting would be the future
> > of Solid, finalizing the wor
