Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
Albert Astals Cid wrote: >A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: >> 2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : >> >> [: Ian Monroe :] >> >> I agree that there's no reason translators and programmers should >> >> use the same system. However I don't think letting individual >> >> projects in KDE p

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Chani
On May 28, 2009 18:46:05 Ian Monroe wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: > >> On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Ian Monroe
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: >> On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN", >> > can't I extend that to "We are loosi

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: > On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN", > > can't I extend that to "We are loosing developers because of > > CURRENT_VCS"? > > only if CURENT_VC

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Zander
On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN", > can't I extend that to "We are loosing developers because of > CURRENT_VCS"? only if CURENT_VCS equals svn. What is your point? -- Thomas Zander __

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] [PATCH] scripty draft 1

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Chani va escriure: > > I'd say there's no need for pull or rebase. > > > > You should do this: > > git fetch $REPOSITORY > > any reason for fetch instead of pull? > > > git clean -x -d -f > > git reset --hard $REPOSITORY/$BRANCH > > [ apply changes ] > > git commit -m

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] [PATCH] scripty draft 1

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Chani va escriure: > On May 26, 2009 08:45:52 Thomas Zander wrote: > > On Tuesday 26. May 2009 09.18.43 Chani wrote: > > > -I'm not sure if I should rebase when I pull, just in case strange > > > things have happened to the git repo. maybe only if the first pull > > >

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: > 2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : > >> [: Ian Monroe :] > >> I agree that there's no reason translators and programmers should use > >> the same system. However I don't think letting individual projects in > >> KDE pick their own VCS is a good ide

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: > 2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : > > First of all, "moving to Git" is under quotes because it's, in my view, a > > misnomer for what should really be done to properly reorganize the > > things, such that we do not set ourselves up for a similar t

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] scripty questions

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dilluns, 25 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: > 2009/5/24 Chani : > >> 2) have scripty copy the doc folder from each git-module into > >> documentation/ and commit it to svn (chusslove's idea). > >> pro: translators don't have to lift a finger, and still no pain for > >> packagers or devel