Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Finalising (was: Getting started)

2009-07-21 Thread Jeremy Whiting
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 5:49:16 am Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em Segunda-feira 17 Setembro 2007, às 21:02:25, Thiago Macieira escreveu: > > I'd like to welcome everyone. This mailing list is to discuss a new > > Source Control Management tool for KDE. It is not tied to a particular > > tool, though I

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

2009-07-21 Thread Ian Monroe
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Chani wrote: > i miss kmail already :P got the list addy wrong this time > > On 7/21/09, Chani wrote: >> oops, it seems google sent my last email to chusslove instead of to the list. >> >>  anyways... i was about halfway through a patch when they came to take >>  m

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

2009-07-21 Thread Chani
i miss kmail already :P got the list addy wrong this time On 7/21/09, Chani wrote: > oops, it seems google sent my last email to chusslove instead of to the list. > > anyways... i was about halfway through a patch when they came to take > my laptop. sorry. > it seemed like a fairly simple patc

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

2009-07-21 Thread Chusslove Illich
>> [: Chusslove Illich :] >> [...] l10n-kde4/templates/messages/amarok/ and the four of Amarok's POTs >> inside? > > [: Chani :] > I assume so. after all, amarok won't physically be in extragear, at least > while it's being a guinea pig. is there a problem with that? I would say that's a problem.

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] SVN closed for commits and Basic Git Groundrules

2009-07-21 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 13:42:27 Jeff Mitchell wrote: > The #2 you saw (and #3 about one branch per bugfix/feature) is more > applicable to a random one-off patch contributor who won't be added to > the kde-developers group. They should clone the repo, create a branch > per bugfix/feature, and then

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

2009-07-21 Thread Chani
On July 21, 2009 09:00:45 Ian Monroe wrote: > 2009/7/21 Chani : > > On July 21, 2009 04:39:27 Chusslove Illich wrote: > >> > [: Chani :] > >> > a) add your module to the list in list_modules (you guys were part of > >> > extragear-multimedia, but now you're your own module) > >> > >> Does this mean

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

2009-07-21 Thread Ian Monroe
2009/7/21 Chani : > On July 21, 2009 04:39:27 Chusslove Illich wrote: >> > [: Chani :] >> > a) add your module to the list in list_modules (you guys were part of >> > extragear-multimedia, but now you're your own module) >> >> Does this mean that, if everything goes according to plan, we are going

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

2009-07-21 Thread Chani
On July 21, 2009 04:39:27 Chusslove Illich wrote: > > [: Chani :] > > a) add your module to the list in list_modules (you guys were part of > > extragear-multimedia, but now you're your own module) > > Does this mean that, if everything goes according to plan, we are going to > end up with e.g. l10

[Kde-scm-interest] Finalising (was: Getting started)

2009-07-21 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em Segunda-feira 17 Setembro 2007, às 21:02:25, Thiago Macieira escreveu: > I'd like to welcome everyone. This mailing list is to discuss a new Source > Control Management tool for KDE. It is not tied to a particular tool, > though I suspect one will dominate the emails. > > You may discuss any SCM

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] SVN closed for commits and Basic Git Groundrules

2009-07-21 Thread Jeff Mitchell
Thomas Zander wrote: > On Tuesday 21 July 2009 13:24:18 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: >> Hmm... I'm a bit scared of using this approach, where you don't share the >> work directly in the mainline repo, but instead work on your own clones. I >> mean, while being very git-ish, aren't we losing here the s

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Amarok move to git broke scripty

2009-07-21 Thread Chusslove Illich
> [: Chani :] > a) add your module to the list in list_modules (you guys were part of > extragear-multimedia, but now you're your own module) Does this mean that, if everything goes according to plan, we are going to end up with e.g. l10n-kde4/templates/messages/amarok/ and the four of Amarok's PO

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] SVN closed for commits and Basic Git Groundrules

2009-07-21 Thread Thomas Zander
On Tuesday 21 July 2009 13:24:18 Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > Hmm... I'm a bit scared of using this approach, where you don't share the > work directly in the mainline repo, but instead work on your own clones. I > mean, while being very git-ish, aren't we losing here the social model that > we all

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] SVN closed for commits and Basic Git Groundrules

2009-07-21 Thread Johannes Sixt
Riccardo Iaconelli schrieb: > On Monday 20 July 2009 10:49:24 Bart Cerneels wrote: >>> 1) Never, ever create a branch in our mainline repo. Ever. You can do it >>> locally, but do not push it up. >>> 2) Clone the repo and work on that. Add mainline as a remote branch in >>> your local copy of your

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] SVN closed for commits and Basic Git Groundrules

2009-07-21 Thread Bart Cerneels
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Riccardo Iaconelli wrote: > On Monday 20 July 2009 10:49:24 Bart Cerneels wrote: >> > 1) Never, ever create a branch in our mainline repo. Ever. You can do it >> > locally, but do not push it up. >> > 2) Clone the repo and work on that. Add mainline as a remote bra

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] SVN closed for commits and Basic Git Groundrules

2009-07-21 Thread Riccardo Iaconelli
On Monday 20 July 2009 10:49:24 Bart Cerneels wrote: > > 1) Never, ever create a branch in our mainline repo. Ever. You can do it > > locally, but do not push it up. > > 2) Clone the repo and work on that. Add mainline as a remote branch in > > your local copy of your cloned repo. Hmm... I'm a bit