Thomas Zander wrote:
> On Saturday 14. November 2009 22.23.22 Chani wrote:
>> I still don't understand why we need access to email addresses from some
>> gitorious database anyways.
>
> I don't know if we do, Johan said that this is not really a solution anyway.
> Thats why I put up 2 usecases w
On Friday 13. November 2009 14.17.24 Ian Monroe wrote:
> I was thinking of asking Gitorious if they could keep a simple log of
> commit hashs and the user name or id that pushed it. Since commit
> hashs are completely unique this would be enough information.
That log is indeed what is required, AF
On Saturday 14. November 2009 22.23.22 Chani wrote:
> I still don't understand why we need access to email addresses from some
> gitorious database anyways.
I don't know if we do, Johan said that this is not really a solution anyway.
Thats why I put up 2 usecases which will be solution independe
2009/11/14 Chani
> On November 13, 2009 08:06:49 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> > Ian Monroe wrote:
> > > Which is why I like my simple flat-file log idea (a log of commit
> > > hash, user id, maybe time). It doesn't open up any privacy issues
> > > (since the info is already public) and would solve the
On November 13, 2009 08:06:49 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> Ian Monroe wrote:
> > Which is why I like my simple flat-file log idea (a log of commit
> > hash, user id, maybe time). It doesn't open up any privacy issues
> > (since the info is already public) and would solve the problem by
> > using the comm
