Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread John Tapsell
On 17 February 2010 23:23, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:50:52PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> Enhancing git to support narrow clones and keeping everything in one >> repository lets individual contributors decide which part(s) of the >> tree are important to the

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 04:50:52PM -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > Enhancing git to support narrow clones and keeping everything in one > repository lets individual contributors decide which part(s) of the > tree are important to them, while allowing atomic cross-module commits > (since they

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 16:24:16 Eike Hein wrote: > On 2/17/2010 10:36 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > I also expect this to be the case, but new contributors will be easier to > > attract if they don't feel they want to wait for code they don't > > (currently) care about anyway and can

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Eike Hein
On 2/17/2010 10:36 PM, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > I also expect this to be the case, but new contributors will be easier to > attract if they don't feel they want to wait for code they don't (currently) > care about anyway and can simply "checkout" the latest version of > extragear/kmynewapp.

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 15:00:39 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > and just in case it's not obvious: one consequence of the delta > compression is that any file's bare presence at any point in time has a > significantly bigger impact than another file's long history. which is > one of the reasons

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Chani
On February 17, 2010 13:00:39 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:36:43PM +, John Tapsell wrote: > > I'm not all that convinced we even need shallow clones. > > > > The Gnome guys found shallow clones only saved a small amount of space: > > > > The first size, in MB, is the

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:36:43PM +, John Tapsell wrote: > I'm not all that convinced we even need shallow clones. > > The Gnome guys found shallow clones only saved a small amount of space: > > The first size, in MB, is the full checkout, and second number is a > shallow clone of depth 1. >

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Back to work!!!!! was: Re: Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Matt Williams
2010/2/17 Chani : > On February 17, 2010 10:01:43 Lydia Pintscher wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 18:56, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: >> > My rsync is running now, how about yours? >> >> yay! >> >> > I'm not sure which module I'll take, is kdegraphics still free? >> >> Yes should still be free. Only o

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Dario Freddi
I'm with Michael here. I (just like many others) started losing interest in the discussion some time ago, when the feeling was that most of the times people kept bringing on the same issues over and over again without getting anywhere. I feel there is a communication problem here. The decisions

[Kde-scm-interest] Post-update Hook For Gitorious

2010-02-17 Thread Ian Monroe
Mostly in the interest of documentation, I've written a small automation script and published the hooks currently used for Amarok, Konversation, & Phonon. http://gitorious.org/remotehook/remotehook Ian ___ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Michael Jansen
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 18:11:34 Thomas Zander wrote: > On Wednesday 17. February 2010 13.45.28 Michael Jansen wrote: > > You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describe how modules > > > > will be split. > > done that some time ago; > $ git clone git://gitorious.org/svn2git/k

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Back to work!!!!! was: Re: Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Chani
On February 17, 2010 10:01:43 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 18:56, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > > My rsync is running now, how about yours? > > yay! > > > I'm not sure which module I'll take, is kdegraphics still free? > > Yes should still be free. Only ones taken so far are game

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Back to work!!!!! was: Re: Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Lydia Pintscher
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 18:56, Boudewijn Rempt wrote: > My rsync is running now, how about yours? yay! > I'm not sure which module I'll take, is kdegraphics still free? Yes should still be free. Only ones taken so far are games, a11y and edu afaik. Cheers Lydia -- Lydia Pintscher Amarok com

[Kde-scm-interest] Back to work!!!!! was: Re: Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Boudewijn Rempt
Right, discussing things back and forth is fun and all that, but it is completely and utterly useless if it's just going over ground that's already trampled flat already. I understand that people new to the list might have their questions, but well, the git project page on techbase lists the tas

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread John Tapsell
2010/2/17 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. : > On Wednesday 17 February 2010 10:41:54 you wrote: >> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 15:53:55 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> > In <201002171345.29844@michael-jansen.biz>, Michael Jansen wrote: >> > >You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describ

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread John Tapsell
2010/2/17 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. : > On Wednesday 17 February 2010 10:41:54 you wrote: >> On Wednesday 17 February 2010 15:53:55 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >> > In <201002171345.29844@michael-jansen.biz>, Michael Jansen wrote: >> > >You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describ

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 10:41:54 you wrote: > On Wednesday 17 February 2010 15:53:55 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > > In <201002171345.29844@michael-jansen.biz>, Michael Jansen wrote: > > >You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describe how modules > > > will be split. > > >

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Thomas Zander
On Wednesday 17. February 2010 13.45.28 Michael Jansen wrote: > You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describe how modules > will be split. done that some time ago; $ git clone git://gitorious.org/svn2git/kde-ruleset.git $ grep 'create repository' kde-ruleset/* (no not providing th

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Michael Jansen
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 15:53:55 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <201002171345.29844@michael-jansen.biz>, Michael Jansen wrote: > >You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describe how modules > > > > will be split. > > Splitting doesn't have to be done at the same time as

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Eike Hein
On 02/17/2010 03:57 PM, John Tapsell wrote: > Is the current plan to have kdebase and kdelibs as separate git > repositories, or a single one? Separate. > John -- Best regards, Eike Hein ___ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org http

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
In <201002171345.29844@michael-jansen.biz>, Michael Jansen wrote: >You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describe how modules > will be split. Splitting doesn't have to be done at the same time as the move to git. > Predict and explain how big > repositories will get using git.

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread John Tapsell
2010/2/17 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. : > In <201002171345.29844@michael-jansen.biz>, Michael Jansen wrote: >>You want to move the core of kde. Make a real plan. Describe how modules >> will be split. > > Splitting doesn't have to be done at the same time as the move to git. Is the current plan to

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Michael Jansen
On Wednesday 17 February 2010 10:09:17 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > Let's stop this BS discussion and name-calling now and actually get > the conversion done, please. > We could go on with this for another year and not get the conversion > done. Let's stop it and get work done. > > What is the progres

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Have we arrived to a dead end?

2010-02-17 Thread Lydia Pintscher
Let's stop this BS discussion and name-calling now and actually get the conversion done, please. We could go on with this for another year and not get the conversion done. Let's stop it and get work done. What is the progress on the conversion rules for edu, games and accessability? Afaik Tomaz, M