On 2/4/2011 3:23 PM, Ian Monroe wrote:
> Maybe you could stir things up a bit and we can find some sort of
> decision. The i18n team has requested that all KDE modules have the
> same name for version branches and I think we can all agree that it
> makes sense.
There's another reason to strive for
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 03:48, Will Stephenson wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2011 09:52:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
>> A Divendres, 4 de febrer de 2011, Will Stephenson va escriure:
>> > I notice that the remote branches for kdepimlibs and plasma-addons do not
>> > have the "KDE/" prefix for the "
On Friday 04 February 2011 09:52:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Divendres, 4 de febrer de 2011, Will Stephenson va escriure:
> > I notice that the remote branches for kdepimlibs and plasma-addons do not
> > have the "KDE/" prefix for the "official" 4.x branches. Is this a known
> > issue?
>
> Ac
On Friday 04 February 2011 08.52.09 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Divendres, 4 de febrer de 2011, Will Stephenson va escriure:
> > I notice that the remote branches for kdepimlibs and plasma-addons do
> > not
> > have the "KDE/" prefix for the "official" 4.x branches. Is this a known
> > issue?
>
A Divendres, 4 de febrer de 2011, Will Stephenson va escriure:
> I notice that the remote branches for kdepimlibs and plasma-addons do not
> have the "KDE/" prefix for the "official" 4.x branches. Is this a known
> issue?
Actually it's the other way around, the KDE/ prefixes shouldn't be there fo
I notice that the remote branches for kdepimlibs and plasma-addons do not have
the "KDE/" prefix for the "official" 4.x branches. Is this a known issue?
WIll
___
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listin
