On Thursday 03 March 2011 15:24:33 Ian Monroe wrote:
> To me kdegames is a textbook case for split repos: you have a very
> simple dependency graph and largely independent projects, both
> technically and socially.
>From real-world experience I'd also recommend this. It is much less painful to
ha
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 16:31, Stefan Majewsky
wrote:
> [crosspost kde-games-devel + kde-scm-interest]
>
> Heya,
>
> I've been thinking about the Git move again. I'm still in favor of the
> monolithic approach for organizational reasons, e.g. I really like
> Aaron's argument that a single repo make
On 02/03/2011, Stefan Majewsky wrote:
> [crosspost kde-games-devel + kde-scm-interest]
Hi,
> I've been thinking about the Git move again. I'm still in favor of the
> monolithic approach for organizational reasons, e.g. I really like
> Aaron's argument that a single repo makes drive-by contributi
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stefan Majewsky
Date: Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [Kde-games-devel] Re: [Kde-scm-interest] RFC: git move
proposal; "duolithic" kdegames
To: KDE games development
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Arno Rehn wrote:
> I don't see why rippi
