On Friday 12 February 2010 19:48:01 Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> I don't believe in a big-bang approach anymore. I think we'll see more and
> more project "defect" on their own.
*sigh*
Too bad.
Ok, i found that I'm way wrong with my assumptions. I guess I shouldn't rant
at all, but what's done that'
On Friday 12 February 2010 19:15:25 Ian Monroe wrote:
> I don't see how anyone could claim that the KOffice folks haven't made
> an honest faith effort to move all of KDE to git. They've devoted time
> and resources.
I didn't claim they didn't.
But OK, there's a little sense in repeating myself.
A
On Friday 12 February 2010 17:33:23 Esben Mose Hansen wrote:
> Could someone spell out to me why moving parts like KOffice to git hinders
> (or helps) anything? The only argument I've heard is that using 2 tools
> raises the bat for developers, but since KOffice development is unlikely
> to need c
On Friday 12 February 2010 13:42:31 Thomas Zander wrote:
> So I and many others in KOffice think that its time to move KOffice to git.
If you are so eager to perform the move and have the people which are willing
to have their time working on migration, why not to use this time of theirs to
help
On Monday 26 of January 2009 18:23:48 you wrote:
> Will do. We'll assign you all the annoying tasks in absentia. ;)
hehe. i'll git stash them ;)
Cheers
Dmitry.
___
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listin
Ian, could you (or someone else) please post short summary and/or meeting log
attached for those unable to attend but interested? :)
Thanks.
On Monday 26 of January 2009 18:06:49 Ian Monroe wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Ian Monroe wrote:
> > I'd like to propose an IRC meeting at Mon
On Sunday 18 January 2009 20:21:15 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I, for one, would advocate for kdelibs to switch to Git[*]. That way, we
> force everyone to start using it and learning it.
Great idea (about learning)! As I feel that I know some git basics, but I
really miss the general flow feeling of
