Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Review request: svn2git rules for Marble

Am Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2010, 15:58:35 schrieb zan...@kde.org: > On Thursday 8. July 2010 15.51.24 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to ask for review of my merge request: > > http://gitorious.org/svn2git/kde-ruleset/merge_requests/2 > >

[Kde-scm-interest] Review request: svn2git rules for Marble

Hi, I'd like to ask for review of my merge request: http://gitorious.org/svn2git/kde-ruleset/merge_requests/2 Or can I just push? Kind regards, Jens-Michael ___ Kde-scm-interest mailing list Kde-scm-interest@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listin

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] kdegames' move to Git

Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2010, 23:22:00 schrieb Thomas Zander: > On Sunday 27. June 2010 21.45.45 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > > > IIRC, "the ones who do the work" wanted monolithic Git repos for some > > > > reasons and "the ones who wanted split packag

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] [Kde-games-devel] kdegames' move to Git

Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2010, 18:48:32 schrieb Chani: > On Sunday, June 27, 2010 06:12:28 am Frederik Schwarzer wrote: > > [Torgny Nyblom - Sonntag 27 Juni 2010 14:39:14] > > > > > On Sunday 27 June 2010 12.40.47 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > > > Am Sonntag, 2

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] [Kde-games-devel] kdegames' move to Git

Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2010, 00:35:50 schrieb Chani: > > First, a Git-related question, which kdegames devs may proabbly skip: The > > proposed ruleset describes one monolithic kdegames repository. Is this > > what has been agreed upon? > > yes. You mean for kdegames? Otherwise there was no decisio

[Kde-scm-interest] Status Marble git conversion

Hi, the svn2git rules for Marble trunk, regular KDE branches/tags and the following branches: marble-0.4, gsoc-2009 and geodata-nt are done and checked. If you miss a work branch in that list, please let me know. The rules are available at http://gitorious.org/~jmho/svn2git/jmhos-kde-ruleset/com

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] techbase moving to google docs?

On Wednesday, 30. September 2009 23:18:44 Ian Monroe wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > > On Thursday, 17. September 2009 02:01:49 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > >> http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MovetoGit has a list of things that > >&

[Kde-scm-interest] techbase moving to google docs?

On Thursday, 17. September 2009 02:01:49 Lydia Pintscher wrote: > http://techbase.kde.org/Projects/MovetoGit has a list of things that > need working on. Please add missing stuff. The document seems to be moved to google docs. Is this really necessary? If yes, why? Imho we should use our (KDEs)