[Kde-scm-interest] svn2git: Representing old work that does not have a direct connection to current master

2012-03-11 Thread Stefan Majewsky
Hi, I'm working on kdegames/palapeli-rules. Palapeli lived in playground/games for a very long time. 1.5 years into its development, I decided to rewrite it from scratch using the lessons I learned over the time. So I moved the directory trunk/playground/games/palapeli to trunk/playground/games/p

[Kde-scm-interest] Module layout proposal: Split kdegames-data from kdegames

2011-10-14 Thread Stefan Majewsky
[CC kde-scm-interest for notification only] [CC kde-buildsystem for feedback on the proposed build system changes] [CC kde-packagers for feedback on the implied changes to package layouts] [@CC: please keep discussion on k-c-d and k-g-d only] Moin moin, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I propose to m

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Data files and the Git move

2011-10-14 Thread Stefan Majewsky
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Stefan Majewsky wrote: > My answer is: Data shall stay in SVN (in a new module kdegames-data) > for now, and be handled like the kde-wallpapers module after that. I > previously wanted kdegames-data to depend on kdegames, but I see that > the revers

[Kde-scm-interest] [Kde-games-devel] Data files and the Git move

2011-09-07 Thread Stefan Majewsky
For some reason GMail did not include the mailinglists, so FWD. -- Forwarded message -- From: Stefan Majewsky Date: Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM Subject: Re: [Kde-scm-interest] [Kde-games-devel] Data files and the Git move To: Johannes Sixt On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 3:12 PM

[Kde-scm-interest] Data files and the Git move

2011-09-04 Thread Stefan Majewsky
Hi folks, I think it should be clear that we need to move to git somewhen, and it is well known that I think it should happen sooner rather than later. There are established processes for building split repos, so the only problem left IMO is the problem of data files. The matter has been discusse

[Kde-scm-interest] Re: libtagaro -> kdereview [-> kdegames]

2011-04-27 Thread Stefan Majewsky
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Torgny Nyblom wrote: > +1 a module is a unit and should be treated as such even if the different apps > are in different gits. So should I move the code to SVN then? This discussion was on kde-games-devel already, and the mass figured it's quite stupid to move cod

[Kde-scm-interest] libtagaro -> kdereview [-> kdegames]

2011-04-21 Thread Stefan Majewsky
Hi, what is the technical procedure for moving libtagaro.git to kdereview? I think sysadmins need be informed, and hope that those are reading here. Assuming that this goes well: I hereby propose to move libtagaro to the kdegames module after the usual review period. For the time being, because k

[Kde-scm-interest] Fwd: [Kde-games-devel] Re: RFC: git move proposal; "duolithic" kdegames

2011-03-03 Thread Stefan Majewsky
-- Forwarded message -- From: Stefan Majewsky Date: Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:05 AM Subject: Re: [Kde-games-devel] Re: [Kde-scm-interest] RFC: git move proposal; "duolithic" kdegames To: KDE games development On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:53 AM, Arno Rehn wrote: > I

[Kde-scm-interest] RFC: git move proposal; "duolithic" kdegames

2011-03-02 Thread Stefan Majewsky
[crosspost kde-games-devel + kde-scm-interest] Heya, I've been thinking about the Git move again. I'm still in favor of the monolithic approach for organizational reasons, e.g. I really like Aaron's argument that a single repo makes drive-by contributions from outside itch-scratchers easier. Howe

[Kde-scm-interest] Re: kdegraphics libs migration

2011-01-02 Thread Stefan Majewsky
Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010, 10:56:27 schrieb Niko Sams: > > You can do "git log okular" if you are interested in the okular log only > > yeah, but that doesn't work that easy in graphical tools like qgit. It does. Open the tree view, right-click the okular directory and choose "Toggle filter

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs Split repositories.

2010-09-09 Thread Stefan Majewsky
On Thursday 09 September 2010 16:43:36 George Goldberg wrote: > kdenetwork (I don't know about other modules, but there may be others) > doesn't have any libraries at all within it (unlike the libkdegames > library used in multiple places throughout kdegames). It is simply 5 > totally unconnected a

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Sysadmin advice regarding Monolithic vs Split repositories.

2010-09-07 Thread Stefan Majewsky
On Tuesday 07 September 2010 22:03:28 Chani wrote: > What I'm concerned about here is plasmoids: even if we go for split > repositories for apps (which I agree would make for a much easier and less > surprising kdereview workflow), it may be a bit excessive for every little > plasmoid to have its o

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] [Kde-games-devel] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-27 Thread Stefan Majewsky
On Sunday 27 June 2010 21:45:45 Jens-Michael Hoffmann wrote: > Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2010, 18:48:32 schrieb Chani: > > every single time the matter was brought up, the end was the same. so > > anyone who wants to comment further on this thread: please, *please* go > > read the archives first. > > I

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] [Kde-games-devel] kdegames' move to Git

2010-06-26 Thread Stefan Majewsky
[CC kde-scm-interest; please cross-post onto both lists where appropriate] On Saturday 26 June 2010 17:50:14 Johannes Obermayr wrote: > Johannes Obermayr proudly presents a nearly finished rule for the move to > Git (http://pastie.org/1019984). ;-) > > Maintainers, please review especially lines