Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-29 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Chani va escriure: > On May 28, 2009 18:46:05 Ian Monroe wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: > > >> On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > >> >

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Thiago Macieira
Albert Astals Cid wrote: >A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: >> 2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : >> >> [: Ian Monroe :] >> >> I agree that there's no reason translators and programmers should >> >> use the same system. However I don't think letting individual >> >> projects in KDE p

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Chani
On May 28, 2009 18:46:05 Ian Monroe wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: > >> On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > >> > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Ian Monroe
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: >> On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: >> > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN", >> > can't I extend that to "We are loosi

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Divendres, 29 de maig de 2009, Thomas Zander va escriure: > On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN", > > can't I extend that to "We are loosing developers because of > > CURRENT_VCS"? > > only if CURENT_VC

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Thomas Zander
On Friday 29. May 2009 00.34.47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: > Well, everyone keeps saying "We are loosing developers because of SVN", > can't I extend that to "We are loosing developers because of > CURRENT_VCS"? only if CURENT_VCS equals svn. What is your point? -- Thomas Zander __

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: > 2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : > >> [: Ian Monroe :] > >> I agree that there's no reason translators and programmers should use > >> the same system. However I don't think letting individual projects in > >> KDE pick their own VCS is a good ide

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-28 Thread Albert Astals Cid
A Dimarts, 26 de maig de 2009, Ian Monroe va escriure: > 2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : > > First of all, "moving to Git" is under quotes because it's, in my view, a > > misnomer for what should really be done to properly reorganize the > > things, such that we do not set ourselves up for a similar t

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-26 Thread Ian Monroe
2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : >> [: Ian Monroe :] >> I agree that there's no reason translators and programmers should use the >> same system. However I don't think letting individual projects in KDE pick >> their own VCS is a good idea. Amarok is probably going to switch before >> the rest, but thi

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-26 Thread Chusslove Illich
> [: Ian Monroe :] > I agree that there's no reason translators and programmers should use the > same system. However I don't think letting individual projects in KDE pick > their own VCS is a good idea. Amarok is probably going to switch before > the rest, but this is purely transitional. Keeping

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-26 Thread Jeff Mitchell
Ian Monroe wrote: >> [amarok] >> section = extragear >> subsection = multimedia >> vcs = git >> repo-base = git://foo.bar.kde/amarok >> ui-stable = s...@branch_2_0 >> ui-trunk = s...@master >> doc-stable = d...@branch_2_0 >> doc-trunk = d...@master > > Outside of the "vcs = git" line (sin

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-26 Thread Ian Monroe
2009/5/26 Chusslove Illich : > First of all, "moving to Git" is under quotes because it's, in my view, a > misnomer for what should really be done to properly reorganize the things, > such that we do not set ourselves up for a similar trouble in the > foreseeable future, and provide even more flexi

[Kde-scm-interest] A concept for "moving to Git" and translations

2009-05-26 Thread Chusslove Illich
First of all, "moving to Git" is under quotes because it's, in my view, a misnomer for what should really be done to properly reorganize the things, such that we do not set ourselves up for a similar trouble in the foreseeable future, and provide even more flexibility right after its up and running