Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Access control

2009-08-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
Thomas Zander wrote: >On Wednesday 12. August 2009 22.33.10 Jeff Mitchell wrote: >> 2) I was thinking about how you were talking about sending out commit >> information via HTTP > >I don't think we should depend on anything happening based on that info, > its not guaranteed that the call reaches th

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Access control

2009-08-16 Thread Thomas Zander
On Wednesday 12. August 2009 22.33.10 Jeff Mitchell wrote: > 2) I was thinking about how you were talking about sending out commit > information via HTTP I don't think we should depend on anything happening based on that info, its not guaranteed that the call reaches the destination. Any assumpti

Re: [Kde-scm-interest] Access control

2009-08-15 Thread Ian Monroe
2009/8/12 Jeff Mitchell : > Johan, > > Had a discussion with some KDE people and had a few thoughts regarding > possible access control/hook solutions: > > 1) You don't want to allow arbitrary shell scripts -- but might there be > a way to allow sanitized text with specific wording, or entered into

[Kde-scm-interest] Access control

2009-08-12 Thread Jeff Mitchell
Johan, Had a discussion with some KDE people and had a few thoughts regarding possible access control/hook solutions: 1) You don't want to allow arbitrary shell scripts -- but might there be a way to allow sanitized text with specific wording, or entered into a specific UI in the webapp, such tha