On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 16.13.34, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> Not for all I hope, for instance when the release team sets the tags for a
> new KDE SC release how is that done if direct push is not supported?
We've already established that direct pushes are supported.
And also note that
On terça-feira, 5 de fevereiro de 2013 18.11.18, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 February 2013 18:00:03 CEST, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> >> oh, you know, you simply cannot use tags when you use gerrit.
> >
> > Well not entirely true, we use them at work.
> > But we also need to maintain a new repo o
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 February 2013 16.36.37 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:13:34PM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 February 2013 00.15.47 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > in fact, i'd strongly recommend *against* allowing direct pushes (to the
> > > baseline branc
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 04:13:34PM +0100, Torgny Nyblom wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 February 2013 00.15.47 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > in fact, i'd strongly recommend *against* allowing direct pushes (to the
> > baseline branches).
>
> Not for all I hope, for instance when the release team sets the t
Hi,
On Tuesday 05 February 2013 00.15.47 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:51:31PM +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
[...]
> > (not permitting direct pushes is unacceptable).
>
> yeah? why? because people would suddenly have to consider the part of
> the policy which says that commi
On Tue, Feb 05, 2013 at 01:09:10PM +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > i don't see how gerrit's built-in webserver should be inherently less
> > secure than all the other systems we have running.
>
> Currently, any changes to access controls
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ben Cooksley:
>> > there is no higher risk of screwin up the repos than with any other git
>> > server.
>>
>> See what happened to Github and Rails. The web frontend was
>> compromised and an unauthorised person was able to push code
Hi all,
Ben Cooksley:
> > there is no higher risk of screwin up the repos than with any other git
> > server.
>
> See what happened to Github and Rails. The web frontend was
> compromised and an unauthorised person was able to push code directly
> into the Rails repository.
Are you referring to
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:51:31PM +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
>> > I'm not involved in KDE but I'd love to see another big project realizing
>> > the
>> > beauty of gerrit. I've som
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> while there are a few (well, two) more steps to take into account,
> gerrit's review-only mode inherently catches most screwups before they
> hit the repository, and consequently contributes to a less scary
> learning experience.
This wa
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:34:45PM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> That might be the root of the misunderstanding here -- I'm not
> proposing to let Gerrit be the gateway; I'm proposing setting it up as
> a standalone service for code review.
>
i don't see how this could work and still be useful.
the
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 11:51:31PM +1300, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> > I'm not involved in KDE but I'd love to see another big project realizing
> > the
> > beauty of gerrit. I've some comments inline:
>
> Does this include the user interface? The
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 6:18 AM, Thomas Koch wrote:
> Hi Jan,
Hi Thomas,
>
> I'm a big gerrit fanboy and have presented it on several occasions and I still
> have nightmares from using jira + reviewboard + git-svn when working on an
> Apache project.
>
> I'm not involved in KDE but I'd love to se
Hi Jan,
I'm a big gerrit fanboy and have presented it on several occasions and I still
have nightmares from using jira + reviewboard + git-svn when working on an
Apache project.
I'm not involved in KDE but I'd love to see another big project realizing the
beauty of gerrit. I've some comments i
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:25:31PM +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Let's discuss whether the goals I outlined above are worth the effort,
> whether they make sense to other people besides me and in case they
> make sense, let's talk about how to get there.
>
that's an impressive lists of things to do
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Hi,
> I'd like to start a discussion about integrating the reviews and git more
> tightly. In particular, what I dislike about the reviewboard is that as a
> project maintainer, I have to carry the patches by hand and that the web
> interface h
Hi,
I'd like to start a discussion about integrating the reviews and git more
tightly. In particular, what I dislike about the reviewboard is that as a
project maintainer, I have to carry the patches by hand and that the web
interface has no information about what the parent commit is.
I have
17 matches
Mail list logo
