[Kde-scm-interest] Re: [kde-edu]: kde-edu git repos to validate

2011-02-08 Thread Ian Monroe
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 07:07, Daniel Laidig wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for working on this! :) > > I just took a look at the parley repo and the first thing i noticed is that > the parley practice and soc branches are still missing. > > This was something I already noticed in the repositories created

[Kde-scm-interest] Re: [kde-edu]: kde-edu git repos to validate

2011-02-08 Thread Daniel Laidig
Hi, thanks for working on this! :) I just took a look at the parley repo and the first thing i noticed is that the parley practice and soc branches are still missing. This was something I already noticed in the repositories created by Niko Sams in December, which he fixed in this commit: comm

[Kde-scm-interest] Re: [kde-edu]: kde-edu git repos to validate

2011-02-08 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Hi, looking at the "libkdeedu" repo, I would almost suggest renaming it to "libkeduvocdocument" or some other fancy name. The widget subdirectory seems empty of sensible contents (?) the qtmmlwidget contains one qwidget which seems to be a qt solution copy. I don't know if anyone is using it.