2009/11/28 ComputerDruid :
> I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem we had about
> having too many people emailed about merge requests. From the wording used, it
> seems that this was done specifically for us (although perhaps other projects
> wanted it too).
>
> http://b
On Sunday 29 November 2009, Ian Monroe wrote:
> 2009/11/28 ComputerDruid :
> > I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem
> > we had about having too many people emailed about merge requests.
> > From the wording used, it seems that this was done specifically for
> > us (alth
2009/11/28 ComputerDruid :
> I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem we had about
> having too many people emailed about merge requests. From the wording used, it
> seems that this was done specifically for us (although perhaps other projects
> wanted it too).
>
> http://b
> hrrrm. there is an rss feed. I wonder if the rss feed is updated when merge
> requests change or only shows new requests...
>
Out of experience I can say that it is also updated everytime the merge
request's state gets updated. You also get a new RSS message on every comment
to that merge req
On November 28, 2009 20:06:20 ComputerDruid wrote:
> On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:36:51 Chani wrote:
> > On November 28, 2009 07:00:37 ComputerDruid wrote:
> > > I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem we
> > > had about having too many people emailed about merge reques
On Saturday 28 November 2009 22:36:51 Chani wrote:
> On November 28, 2009 07:00:37 ComputerDruid wrote:
> > I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem we had
> > about having too many people emailed about merge requests. From the
> > wording used, it seems that this was don
On November 28, 2009 07:00:37 ComputerDruid wrote:
> I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem we had
> about having too many people emailed about merge requests. From the
> wording used, it seems that this was done specifically for us (although
> perhaps other projects w
I just read on the gitorious blog about a solution to the problem we had about
having too many people emailed about merge requests. From the wording used, it
seems that this was done specifically for us (although perhaps other projects
wanted it too).
http://blog.gitorious.org/2009/11/26/reposi
