On Monday 1. March 2010 01.45.38 Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> The question is wheter they give us enough to be worth not just hosting it
> on our servers like we've been doing with svn.
That comparison is not entirely honest to ourselves; svn is a different layer
in the stack as gitorious.
If we
A Diumenge, 28 de febrer de 2010, Thomas Zander va escriure:
> On Sunday 28. February 2010 11.30.32 Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> > They hosted Amarok for free, and so far I had assumed it was a free
> > service in general.
>
> Free services are free because you can't go to them and demand better
> se
On Sunday 28 February 2010 05:00:11 am Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> On 28.02.2010, at 11:30, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Frank Karlitschek
wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> I just want to let you know that we from the KDE e.V. board are in
> >> contact with the gitori
On Sunday 28. February 2010 11.30.32 Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> They hosted Amarok for free, and so far I had assumed it was a free
> service in general.
Free services are free because you can't go to them and demand better service
if they are lacking.
If Google lost all your mail you can't go to
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> noting is for free. Especially not if several people work on this full time
> and want to make a living out of that. Servers and hosting also costs money.
>
> Their business model seams to be to offer free services for smaller projects
On 28.02.2010, at 11:30, Mark Kretschmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Frank Karlitschek
> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I just want to let you know that we from the KDE e.V. board are in contact
>> with the gitorious guys to talk about a possible contract.
>>
>> One of the most inter
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I just want to let you know that we from the KDE e.V. board are in contact
> with the gitorious guys to talk about a possible contract.
>
> One of the most interesting points is of course the amount of money they want
> from
On 02/25/2010 05:01 PM, Frank Karlitschek wrote:
> We will keep you informed about the progress. :-)
Thanks Frank, good to know the ball is rolling.
> Cheers
> Frank
--
Best regards,
Eike Hein
___
Kde-scm-interest mailing list
Kde-scm-interest@kde.or
Hi guys,
I just want to let you know that we from the KDE e.V. board are in contact
with the gitorious guys to talk about a possible contract.
One of the most interesting points is of course the amount of money they want
from us to host KDE.
We will keep you informed about the progress. :-)
On Wednesday 07 May 2008 21:02:18 Patrick Aljord wrote:
> The word "fork" has a pretty bad connotation in the FOSS world,
Nah, thats just for the media and casual visitor. Developers don't have
that negative feeling at all AFAIK.
--
Thomas Zander
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitall
Thiago, I guess we need to wait on what you and the other in charge
decide how to go with private branches and general structure of the
repository. Just ping us when you think we can get started though I
guess any discussion on the subject will happen in this list right?
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:3
Hi,
I am the initial author of Gitorious, and I have to say it's pretty
awesome you guys are considering adapting it to your needs. And for
what it's worth, those needs seem to fit in fairly good with how I see
Gitorious evolve, so I'm obviously interested in helping out Patrick
and friends, if th
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:03 PM, Patrick Aljord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyone? I know you're busy with 4.1 but if you have a minute please
> tell us what you think =)
>
> Pat
>
> On 4/27/08, Patrick Aljord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've posted on techbase a proposition f
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Thiago Macieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, we're talking about clones here and push access to each of the
> clones.
ok
> We aren't very clear on the ACLs on branches on the mainline
> repositories...
>
you mean you haven't decided yet how to manage AC
Patrick Aljord wrote:
>On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Thiago Macieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The idea is that a private repository is for anything the developer
>> wants. He could be branching kdelibs for some work of his or he could
>> be starting a new app. Or publishing his changes to
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Thiago Macieira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea is that a private repository is for anything the developer wants. He
> could be branching kdelibs for some work of his or he could be starting a new
> app. Or publishing his changes to git itself. It doesn't m
On Monday 05 May 2008 18:50:25 Patrick Aljord wrote:
> Ok thanks for your answers, I have a couple of questions:
> > I would recommend doing that for the extragear/review/playground level
> > modules, because those tend to share a lot less code. Each app and each
> > library should get its own r
Ok thanks for your answers, I have a couple of questions:
> I would recommend doing that for the extragear/review/playground level
> modules, because those tend to share a lot less code. Each app and each
> library should get its own repository.
So big projects (kdelibs, kdebase etc) shouldn't
Just adding some thoughts/views here to strenghten what Thiago said.
On Monday 5. May 2008 10:31:53 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I agree with Johannes here. I know Oswald wants the split at the
> library/app level inside the KDE main modules. But I don't think
> Git-submodule support is good enough fo
On Monday 05 May 2008 09:07:50 Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Patrick Aljord schrieb:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I've posted on techbase a proposition for using Gitorious with KDE. We
> > have a few questions and suggestions there so please feel free to
> > answer us and help us with your ideas. We're very open.
Patrick Aljord schrieb:
> Hi all,
>
> I've posted on techbase a proposition for using Gitorious with KDE. We
> have a few questions and suggestions there so please feel free to
> answer us and help us with your ideas. We're very open. This is based
> on the work of Mario Danic modified and adapted
anyone? I know you're busy with 4.1 but if you have a minute please
tell us what you think =)
Pat
On 4/27/08, Patrick Aljord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've posted on techbase a proposition for using Gitorious with KDE. We
> have a few questions and suggestions there so please feel
Hi all,
I've posted on techbase a proposition for using Gitorious with KDE. We
have a few questions and suggestions there so please feel free to
answer us and help us with your ideas. We're very open. This is based
on the work of Mario Danic modified and adapted by David and Jorge
Cuadrado and mys
23 matches
Mail list logo
