I was using "instead" for the case that there is not enough manpower for
Testing repos for all major distros. Then the obvious choice would be to use
the platform that targets most distributions.
As far as I'm aware, at least most core Plasma devs know their way around OBS
because of Vivaldi/Me
On 02/13/2013 03:51 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 15:27:44 Markus wrote:
Instead of Project Neon which is tied to a specific distribution someone
with the proper knowledge should rather do a "KDE:/Testing" repo in OBS.
It's not "instead of", it is "in addition to".
Al
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 February 2013 15:27:44 Markus wrote:
> > Instead of Project Neon which is tied to a specific distribution someone
> > with the proper knowledge should rather do a "KDE:/Testing" repo in OBS.
> It's not "instead of", it is "i
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 15:27:44 Markus wrote:
> Instead of Project Neon which is tied to a specific distribution someone
> with the proper knowledge should rather do a "KDE:/Testing" repo in OBS.
It's not "instead of", it is "in addition to".
Also here the problem is the "proper knowledge"
Instead of Project Neon which is tied to a specific distribution someone with
the proper knowledge should rather do a "KDE:/Testing" repo in OBS. OBS has
the advantage that it can not only build for openSUSE but also Arch, Fedora,
Ubuntu, Debian, Mandriva,... (the cross-distro version of Unity i
Hi all,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 1:21 PM, David Edmundson
wrote:
...
>
> Questions:
> - How much is it actually a problem? Is there a way to quantify how many
> regressions come in during minor releases?
I think it is a big problem, and from the user perspective it sheds a
bad light on the poin
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:21:14 +, David Edmundson wrote:
There is a current thread on the release team mailing list "Better
testing of tagged tars" during the massive email thread the topic of
testing the minor releases comes up. There is a supposed problem in
KDE that we have people running st
Hi,
>
> Questions:
> - How much is it actually a problem? Is there a way to quantify how
> many regressions come in during minor releases?
I don't know about this
> - How many user's do you think we could get?
With proper communication, probably enough to make it worth.
> - Is it worth pushing
On Wednesday 13 February 2013 12:21:14 David Edmundson wrote:
> Questions:
> - How much is it actually a problem?
For me it's a huge problem. I'm quite afraid of pushing to branch at all
because it's not tested (KWin is special in that regard we may never ever have
regressions). In the end it mea
There is a current thread on the release team mailing list "Better testing
of tagged tars" during the massive email thread the topic of testing the
minor releases comes up. There is a supposed problem in KDE that we have
people running stable releases and we have people running the very latest
mast
10 matches
Mail list logo
