On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 10:04 PM Christoph Cullmann
wrote:
>
> On 2019-09-04 11:52, Hannah von Reth wrote:
> > I’d prefer it taken down.
> > It’s basically useless.
> >
> > The src still exists so it's not "gone" or we host it separately with
> > a lot of disclaimers.
>
> I would prefer to have it
On 2019-09-04 11:52, Hannah von Reth wrote:
I’d prefer it taken down.
It’s basically useless.
The src still exists so it's not "gone" or we host it separately with
a lot of disclaimers.
I would prefer to have it purged, too.
Greetings
Christoph
Cheers
Hannah
Sent from my iPhone
On 4. Se
I’d prefer it taken down.
It’s basically useless.
The src still exists so it's not "gone" or we host it separately with a lot of
disclaimers.
Cheers
Hannah
Sent from my iPhone
On 4. Sep 2019, at 10:46, Albert Vaca Cintora
mailto:albertv...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Would it be worth it to take th
Would it be worth it to take that link down? It is nice to preserve it for
historical reasons, but it is confusing users (we see emails like this one
often).
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, 03:41 Aaron R. Durland
wrote:
> Hi Albert...
>
> Thank you for getting back with me! If I remember correctly, I downl
