gt; http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
--
Jean-Nicolas
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20131125/65151e84/attachment.html>
Le 25/11/2013 19:01, Brian Matherly a ?crit :
> But I haven't done my own assessment of the code - which is why I started my
> comments by asking if anyone else had assessed the code in master. Without an
> assessment of the code, nobody (except JB) will know how hard it will be to
> get it run
Le lundi 25 novembre 2013 07:26:54 Brian Matherly a ?crit :
> I still think that anyone capable of adding features would be capable of
> getting master working. Master does run - and it looks really great. There
> are just some editing functions that need to get hooked back up.
You think that, so
Le lundi 25 novembre 2013 06:13:44 Brian Matherly a ?crit :
> Has anyone done an assessment of what it would take to get master working
> without reverting all the refactor changes?
I think that just Jean-Baptiste knows what we must do to make it work without
reverting.
> I would predict that i
nlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20131125/cc076bf4/attachment.html>
Le lundi 25 novembre 2013 00:57:03 Evert Vorster a ?crit :
> I have to admit that I am also a little sad to see no commits to the
> git for the last six months.
>
> There are some bugs in the last stable release that could do with
> fixing while we wait for J-B-M to re-appear.
>
> While I am not
Le lundi 25 novembre 2013 11:41:30 Vincent PINON a ?crit :
> Hello,
>
> 100% agree with restoring master to stable state, as suggested in my
> previous mail: go on J.-N.!
> (+maybe cherry-pick last Laurent's optimizations that had commits after
> refactoring merge?)
Not necessary, was optimizatio
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 12:41:30 +0200 Vincent PINON
:
> Hello,
>
> 100% agree with restoring master to stable state, as suggested in my
> previous mail: go on J.-N.!
> (+maybe cherry-pick last Laurent's optimizations that had commits after
> refactoring merge?)
>
> I'm finishing other pr
Hello,
100% agree with restoring master to stable state, as suggested in my
previous mail: go on J.-N.!
(+maybe cherry-pick last Laurent's optimizations that had commits after
refactoring merge?)
I'm finishing other projects & plan to free some time for kdenlive by
end of year, but I'm still not
>> I still think that anyone capable of adding features would be capable of
>> getting master working. Master does run - and it looks really great. There
>> are just some editing functions that need to get hooked back up.>
>You think that, so you will do it ?
>
>Do you launch master ?
>"just some
e-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Evert Vorster
> Chief Observer
> WG Cook
>
>
> --
> Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
> Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
> Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
> conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up
> now.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> ___
> Kdenlive-devel mailing list
> Kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kdenlive-devel
>
--
--
Tore Brigaglia
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20131125/dacad2be/attachment.html>
I agree here.
No new features to 9.x branch, just bug fixes.
The master does look promising, and leverages the latest KDE tech, so
it would be silly to throw away all that hard work.
-Evert-
On 25 November 2013 08:13, Brian Matherly wrote:
> Has anyone done an assessment of what it would take
> what do you mean with "0.9" ? if you mean 0.9.0, its a long time ago code,
> with logs of bugs and features lost..
> If you mean 0.9.6, its ok (for me at least).
I am referring to the v0.9 "stable" branch.
See here in the "heads" list:
http://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kdenlive.git
There is a
Hi Jean-Nicolas,
I am totally ok with your plan.
I will help you to improve it.
We must restart this project.
Regards
Le dimanche 24 novembre 2013 20:22:23 Jean-Nicolas Artaud a ?crit :
> Hello KDEnlive people,
>
> I'm new to the list, my name is Jean-Nicolas Artaud, but you may know me as
>
el
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kdenlive/attachments/20131125/c4a16f56/attachment.html>
I have to admit that I am also a little sad to see no commits to the
git for the last six months.
There are some bugs in the last stable release that could do with
fixing while we wait for J-B-M to re-appear.
While I am not a coder, it would be a terrible waste to let such a
good project die, and
16 matches
Mail list logo
