+1 vote for this type of design.
Clean and simple wins every time for me. Good menus trump complex graphics.
I haven't got the energy to search through dense graphics when I'm
looking for hard information.
David
On 29/01/16 04:33, Brian Cluff wrote:
A "clean" design...
Brian Cluff
___
A "clean" design...
Brian Cluff
___
kdenlive mailing list
kdenlive@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kdenlive
I just noticed that Openhub's stats for Kdenlive are 8 months out of date, it
makes it look like the project is inactive:
https://www.openhub.net/p/kdenlive
What info should I give as a Code Location for it to update properly?
https://quickgit.kde.org/?p=kdenlive.git ?
or, if someone else feel
Just my .02 euros and solely highly subjective impression:
- My impression from other discussions so far is that Kdenlive wants to
address both newcomers with less demanding projects as well as semipro
or even professional users. I would suspect that a clean, sleek look
will attract all these
In my humble opinion:
- I prefer a professional look over a super-media-rich one, if Kdenlive
project is really addressed to professional users.
Iwan's tiger or megascreenshots is so presumptuous to look serious, but
has cleaner header (the top).
- I suggest to replace "Linux" by "GNU/Linux"
- I
